PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRFOX vs. SCHV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MRFOX vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRFOX achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly lower than SCHV's 15.29% return. Over the past 10 years, MRFOX has outperformed SCHV with an annualized return of 15.46%, while SCHV has yielded a comparatively lower 11.49% annualized return.


MRFOX

1D
0.32%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
-0.58%
6M
-0.78%
1Y
5.06%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
15.46%

SCHV

1D
1.25%
1M
5.01%
YTD
15.29%
6M
16.89%
1Y
29.14%
3Y*
18.82%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
11.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRFOX vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MRFOX
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund
-0.58%10.05%17.10%17.68%5.06%17.71%15.19%36.26%1.89%25.92%
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
15.29%16.02%14.13%8.93%-7.65%25.58%2.64%25.92%-7.30%16.56%

Correlation

The correlation between MRFOX and SCHV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.83

The correlation between MRFOX and SCHV shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRFOX vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRFOX
MRFOX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
MRFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
MRFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHV
SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRFOX vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MRFOXSCHVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.54

2.75

-2.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.85

3.91

-3.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.49

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

4.31

-3.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.37

17.47

-15.09

MRFOX vs. SCHV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRFOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the SCHV Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRFOX and SCHV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MRFOXSCHVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

2.75

-2.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.73

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.09

0.68

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

0.72

+0.35

Drawdowns

MRFOX vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRFOX drawdown since its inception was -29.10%, smaller than the maximum SCHV drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRFOX and SCHV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRFOXSCHVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.10%

-37.08%

+7.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.03%

-6.83%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.91%

-15.26%

+7.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.98%

-19.78%

+6.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.10%

-37.08%

+7.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.99%

0.00%

-2.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-3.83%

+1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

1.69%

+0.74%

Volatility

MRFOX vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX) is 2.58%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a volatility of 3.18%. This indicates that MRFOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRFOXSCHVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

3.18%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.93%

8.17%

-1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.78%

10.64%

-0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.06%

14.51%

-2.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.26%

16.94%

-2.68%

MRFOX vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRFOX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

MRFOX vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison

MRFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than SCHV's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MRFOX
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund
1.63%1.62%4.59%0.46%0.35%6.78%2.68%1.39%1.94%2.06%0.60%0.00%
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
1.76%2.02%2.25%2.42%2.37%1.93%3.03%3.02%3.05%2.37%2.65%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


MRFOX and SCHV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHV has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to MRFOX (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRFOX dropped -29.10% vs SCHV's -37.08%.

SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRFOX and SCHV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer