MRCY vs. CODA
MRCY (Mercury Systems, Inc.) and CODA (Coda Octopus Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Aerospace & Defense industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, MRCY returned 16.46%/yr vs 17.92%/yr for CODA. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MRCY vs. CODA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRCY achieves a 51.86% return, which is significantly higher than CODA's 1.72% return. Over the past 10 years, MRCY has underperformed CODA with an annualized return of 16.46%, while CODA has yielded a comparatively higher 17.92% annualized return.
MRCY
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 12.50%
- YTD
- 51.86%
- 6M
- 47.69%
- 1Y
- 113.91%
- 3Y*
- 47.05%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- 16.46%
CODA
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- -20.30%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- 1Y
- 19.44%
- 3Y*
- 4.04%
- 5Y*
- 1.23%
- 10Y*
- 17.92%
MRCY vs. CODA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRCY Mercury Systems, Inc. | 51.86% | 73.83% | 14.85% | -18.26% | -18.74% | -37.47% | 27.42% | 46.14% | -7.91% | 69.92% |
CODA Coda Octopus Group, Inc. | 1.72% | 18.77% | 30.07% | -12.24% | -14.25% | 27.19% | -24.85% | 43.81% | 21.96% | 94.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRCY and CODA is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2008 | 0.09 |
Over the past year, MRCY and CODA have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
MRCY:
$6.58B
CODA:
$106.76M
MRCY:
-$0.24
CODA:
$0.44
MRCY:
6.79
CODA:
3.82
MRCY:
$966.95M
CODA:
$27.95M
MRCY:
$277.35M
CODA:
$18.68M
MRCY:
-$12.94M
CODA:
$7.80M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRCY vs. CODA — Risk / Return Rank
MRCY
CODA
MRCY vs. CODA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mercury Systems, Inc. (MRCY) and Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MRCY | CODA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.11 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 0.44 | +3.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.87 | 1.09 | +7.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MRCY vs. CODA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRCY drawdown since its inception was -95.95%, roughly equal to the maximum CODA drawdown of -99.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRCY and CODA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRCY | CODA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.95% | -99.44% | +3.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.19% | -44.87% | +12.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.04% | -44.87% | +9.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.43% | -50.14% | -12.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.73% | -76.78% | +5.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.84% | -50.13% | +42.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.70% | -61.09% | +7.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.89% | 17.82% | -4.93% |
Volatility
MRCY vs. CODA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mercury Systems, Inc. (MRCY) is 19.44%, while Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) has a volatility of 24.67%. This indicates that MRCY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CODA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRCY | CODA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.44% | 24.67% | -5.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.48% | 51.49% | -7.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.02% | 64.51% | -7.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.24% | 49.57% | -3.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.10% | 66.07% | -21.97% |
Dividends
MRCY vs. CODA - Dividend Comparison
Neither MRCY nor CODA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MRCY vs. CODA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mercury Systems, Inc. and Coda Octopus Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MRCY vs. CODA - Profitability Comparison
MRCY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mercury Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 69.05M and revenue of 235.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.3%.
CODA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.58M and revenue of 6.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.3%.
MRCY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mercury Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.23M and revenue of 235.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.
CODA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.79M and revenue of 6.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.0%.
MRCY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mercury Systems, Inc. reported a net income of -2.86M and revenue of 235.76M, resulting in a net margin of -1.2%.
CODA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. reported a net income of 1.70M and revenue of 6.90M, resulting in a net margin of 24.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MRCY and CODA have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CODA has higher volatility (24.67%) compared to MRCY (19.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRCY dropped -95.95% vs CODA's -99.44%.
MRCY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MRCY and CODA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer