PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRCY vs. CODA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MRCY vs. CODA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mercury Systems, Inc. (MRCY) and Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRCY achieves a 52.84% return, which is significantly higher than CODA's 35.16% return. Over the past 10 years, MRCY has underperformed CODA with an annualized return of 17.98%, while CODA has yielded a comparatively higher 25.86% annualized return.


MRCY

1D
-1.13%
1M
42.10%
YTD
52.84%
6M
58.89%
1Y
119.49%
3Y*
39.59%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
17.98%

CODA

1D
-2.78%
1M
9.11%
YTD
35.16%
6M
47.80%
1Y
95.79%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
7.65%
10Y*
25.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRCY vs. CODA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MRCY
Mercury Systems, Inc.
52.84%73.83%14.85%-18.26%-18.74%-37.47%27.42%46.14%-7.91%69.92%
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
35.16%18.77%30.07%-12.24%-14.25%27.19%-24.85%43.81%21.96%94.00%

Correlation

The correlation between MRCY and CODA is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2008

0.09

The correlation between MRCY and CODA shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MRCY:

$6.63B

CODA:

$141.93M

EPS

MRCY:

-$0.24

CODA:

$0.37

PS Ratio

MRCY:

6.83

CODA:

5.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

MRCY:

$966.95M

CODA:

$28.06M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MRCY:

$277.35M

CODA:

$18.60M

EBITDA (TTM)

MRCY:

-$12.94M

CODA:

$6.92M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRCY vs. CODA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRCY
MRCY Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
MRCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRCY Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MRCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRCY Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

CODA
CODA Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
CODA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CODA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
CODA Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
CODA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CODA Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRCY vs. CODA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mercury Systems, Inc. (MRCY) and Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MRCYCODADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.15

1.54

+0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.69

2.27

+0.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.27

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.73

2.75

+0.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.32

6.12

+3.20

MRCY vs. CODA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRCY Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the CODA Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRCY and CODA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MRCYCODADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

1.54

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.16

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.38

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.05

+0.15

Drawdowns

MRCY vs. CODA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRCY drawdown since its inception was -95.95%, roughly equal to the maximum CODA drawdown of -99.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRCY and CODA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRCYCODADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.95%

-99.44%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.19%

-35.02%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.07%

-47.98%

+8.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.43%

-51.82%

-10.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.73%

-76.78%

+5.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-33.74%

+32.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.80%

-61.15%

+7.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.87%

15.71%

-2.84%

Volatility

MRCY vs. CODA - Volatility Comparison

Mercury Systems, Inc. (MRCY) has a higher volatility of 16.48% compared to Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) at 12.11%. This indicates that MRCY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CODA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRCYCODADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.48%

12.11%

+4.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.71%

47.01%

-4.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.79%

63.79%

-8.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.72%

48.88%

-3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.86%

69.02%

-25.16%

Dividends

MRCY vs. CODA - Dividend Comparison

Neither MRCY nor CODA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

MRCY vs. CODA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mercury Systems, Inc. and Coda Octopus Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
235.76M
6.71M
(MRCY) Total Revenue
(CODA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MRCY vs. CODA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mercury Systems, Inc. and Coda Octopus Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
29.3%
65.1%
Portfolio components
MRCY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mercury Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 69.05M and revenue of 235.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.3%.

CODA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.37M and revenue of 6.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.1%.

MRCY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mercury Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.23M and revenue of 235.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.

CODA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.01M and revenue of 6.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.1%.

MRCY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mercury Systems, Inc. reported a net income of -2.86M and revenue of 235.76M, resulting in a net margin of -1.2%.

CODA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. reported a net income of 930.72K and revenue of 6.71M, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MRCY and CODA have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRCY has higher volatility (16.48%) compared to CODA (12.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRCY dropped -95.95% vs CODA's -99.44%.

MRCY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRCY and CODA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer