PortfoliosLab logo
MPW vs. GOOD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MPW and GOOD is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

MPW vs. GOOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPW) and Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MPW:

0.00

GOOD:

0.53

Sortino Ratio

MPW:

0.38

GOOD:

0.76

Omega Ratio

MPW:

1.04

GOOD:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

MPW:

-0.01

GOOD:

0.27

Martin Ratio

MPW:

-0.05

GOOD:

1.01

Ulcer Index

MPW:

21.57%

GOOD:

9.00%

Daily Std Dev

MPW:

52.77%

GOOD:

20.86%

Max Drawdown

MPW:

-84.50%

GOOD:

-67.22%

Current Drawdown

MPW:

-74.07%

GOOD:

-26.35%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MPW:

$2.81B

GOOD:

$664.69M

EPS

MPW:

-$2.72

GOOD:

$0.30

PEG Ratio

MPW:

1.93

GOOD:

-62.67

PS Ratio

MPW:

2.83

GOOD:

4.40

PB Ratio

MPW:

0.59

GOOD:

3.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

MPW:

$948.03M

GOOD:

$151.17M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MPW:

$611.44M

GOOD:

$118.59M

EBITDA (TTM)

MPW:

-$692.32M

GOOD:

$118.40M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPW achieves a 18.28% return, which is significantly higher than GOOD's -9.03% return. Over the past 10 years, MPW has underperformed GOOD with an annualized return of -3.55%, while GOOD has yielded a comparatively higher 6.31% annualized return.


MPW

YTD

18.28%

1M

-16.03%

6M

10.04%

1Y

0.05%

3Y*

-30.76%

5Y*

-17.59%

10Y*

-3.55%

GOOD

YTD

-9.03%

1M

1.78%

6M

-15.82%

1Y

11.00%

3Y*

-2.91%

5Y*

3.58%

10Y*

6.31%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Medical Properties Trust, Inc.

Gladstone Commercial Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MPW vs. GOOD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MPW is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MPW is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MPW is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MPW is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MPW is 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MPW is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GOOD is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GOOD is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GOOD is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GOOD is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GOOD is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GOOD is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MPW vs. GOOD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPW) and Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MPW Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the GOOD Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPW and GOOD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

MPW vs. GOOD - Dividend Comparison

MPW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.46%, which matches GOOD's 8.40% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MPW
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
8.46%11.65%17.92%10.41%4.74%4.96%4.83%6.22%6.97%7.40%7.65%6.10%
GOOD
Gladstone Commercial Corporation
8.40%7.39%9.06%8.13%5.83%8.34%6.86%8.37%7.12%7.46%10.28%8.74%

Drawdowns

MPW vs. GOOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPW drawdown since its inception was -84.50%, which is greater than GOOD's maximum drawdown of -67.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPW and GOOD.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

MPW vs. GOOD - Volatility Comparison

Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPW) has a higher volatility of 11.62% compared to Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) at 5.89%. This indicates that MPW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

MPW vs. GOOD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Medical Properties Trust, Inc. and Gladstone Commercial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-100.00M0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20212022202320242025
223.80M
37.50M
(MPW) Total Revenue
(GOOD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MPW vs. GOOD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Medical Properties Trust, Inc. and Gladstone Commercial Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
96.9%
77.4%
(MPW) Gross Margin
(GOOD) Gross Margin
MPW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Medical Properties Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 216.76M and revenue of 223.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.9%.

GOOD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported a gross profit of 29.03M and revenue of 37.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.4%.

MPW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Medical Properties Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 110.28M and revenue of 223.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.3%.

GOOD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported an operating income of 13.64M and revenue of 37.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.4%.

MPW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Medical Properties Trust, Inc. reported a net income of -99.14M and revenue of 223.80M, resulting in a net margin of -44.3%.

GOOD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported a net income of 5.13M and revenue of 37.50M, resulting in a net margin of 13.7%.