MPGFX vs. FCNKX
Compare and contrast key facts about Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNKX).
MPGFX is managed by Mairs & Power. It was launched on Nov 7, 1958. FCNKX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
MPGFX vs. FCNKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MPGFX vs. FCNKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPGFX Mairs & Power Growth Fund | -3.78% | 10.55% | 19.61% | 27.70% | -21.28% | 29.42% | 16.80% | 28.40% | -4.27% | 16.54% |
FCNKX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | -5.37% | 21.88% | 36.08% | 39.50% | -27.44% | 24.66% | 32.50% | 30.18% | -2.27% | 32.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MPGFX achieves a -3.78% return, which is significantly higher than FCNKX's -5.37% return. Over the past 10 years, MPGFX has underperformed FCNKX with an annualized return of 11.50%, while FCNKX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.48% annualized return.
MPGFX
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- -5.82%
- YTD
- -3.78%
- 6M
- -3.77%
- 1Y
- 11.34%
- 3Y*
- 14.84%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.50%
FCNKX
- 1D
- 3.50%
- 1M
- -5.88%
- YTD
- -5.37%
- 6M
- -2.55%
- 1Y
- 19.31%
- 3Y*
- 25.20%
- 5Y*
- 13.66%
- 10Y*
- 16.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MPGFX vs. FCNKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MPGFX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than FCNKX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MPGFX vs. FCNKX — Risk / Return Rank
MPGFX
FCNKX
MPGFX vs. FCNKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MPGFX | FCNKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | 1.02 | -0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.05 | 1.57 | -0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.22 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 1.54 | -0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.17 | 5.88 | -1.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MPGFX | FCNKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 1.02 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.72 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.06 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.06 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between MPGFX and FCNKX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MPGFX vs. FCNKX - Dividend Comparison
MPGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, less than FCNKX's 4.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPGFX Mairs & Power Growth Fund | 4.66% | 4.48% | 3.84% | 2.34% | 8.80% | 8.13% | 8.81% | 7.39% | 8.76% | 9.47% | 5.84% | 7.92% |
FCNKX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | 4.91% | 5.18% | 4.28% | 4.31% | 13.69% | 10.77% | 8.00% | 4.15% | 9.14% | 6.09% | 3.92% | 4.47% |
Drawdowns
MPGFX vs. FCNKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MPGFX drawdown since its inception was -61.00%, smaller than the maximum FCNKX drawdown of -90.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPGFX and FCNKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MPGFX | FCNKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.00% | -90.08% | +29.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.21% | -11.29% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.87% | -31.77% | +5.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.08% | -90.08% | +57.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.65% | -8.19% | +1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.75% | -7.38% | -7.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 2.95% | -0.07% |
Volatility
MPGFX vs. FCNKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX) is 5.80%, while Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNKX) has a volatility of 6.58%. This indicates that MPGFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MPGFX | FCNKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 6.58% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.85% | 11.17% | -1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.89% | 19.98% | -2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 19.16% | -1.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 288.07% | -270.00% |