PortfoliosLab logo
MPGFX vs. FCNKX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MPGFX and FCNKX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

MPGFX vs. FCNKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
161.84%
591.55%
MPGFX
FCNKX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MPGFX:

-0.01

FCNKX:

0.68

Sortino Ratio

MPGFX:

0.15

FCNKX:

1.08

Omega Ratio

MPGFX:

1.02

FCNKX:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

MPGFX:

0.01

FCNKX:

0.76

Martin Ratio

MPGFX:

0.03

FCNKX:

2.61

Ulcer Index

MPGFX:

6.93%

FCNKX:

5.74%

Daily Std Dev

MPGFX:

18.80%

FCNKX:

21.80%

Max Drawdown

MPGFX:

-60.43%

FCNKX:

-46.44%

Current Drawdown

MPGFX:

-13.15%

FCNKX:

-8.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPGFX achieves a -5.87% return, which is significantly lower than FCNKX's -0.80% return. Over the past 10 years, MPGFX has underperformed FCNKX with an annualized return of 4.34%, while FCNKX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.43% annualized return.


MPGFX

YTD

-5.87%

1M

10.35%

6M

-11.81%

1Y

-0.13%

5Y*

7.40%

10Y*

4.34%

FCNKX

YTD

-0.80%

1M

14.18%

6M

-1.92%

1Y

14.66%

5Y*

17.45%

10Y*

14.43%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MPGFX vs. FCNKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPGFX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than FCNKX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MPGFX vs. FCNKX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPGFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MPGFX is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MPGFX is 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MPGFX is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MPGFX is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MPGFX is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MPGFX is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNKX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCNKX is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCNKX is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCNKX is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCNKX is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCNKX is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCNKX is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MPGFX vs. FCNKX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MPGFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the FCNKX Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPGFX and FCNKX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.01
0.68
MPGFX
FCNKX

Dividends

MPGFX vs. FCNKX - Dividend Comparison

MPGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than FCNKX's 5.08% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MPGFX
Mairs & Power Growth Fund
0.92%0.87%0.83%0.86%0.56%1.07%1.24%1.50%1.37%1.42%1.60%1.32%
FCNKX
Fidelity Contrafund Fund
5.08%4.28%4.31%13.69%10.77%8.00%4.15%9.14%6.26%3.92%0.41%7.77%

Drawdowns

MPGFX vs. FCNKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPGFX drawdown since its inception was -60.43%, which is greater than FCNKX's maximum drawdown of -46.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPGFX and FCNKX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-13.15%
-8.34%
MPGFX
FCNKX

Volatility

MPGFX vs. FCNKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX) is 10.48%, while Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNKX) has a volatility of 11.78%. This indicates that MPGFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
10.48%
11.78%
MPGFX
FCNKX