PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPFRY vs. IBM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MPFRY vs. IBM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mapfre SA ADR (MPFRY) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPFRY achieves a 7.40% return, which is significantly higher than IBM's -23.51% return. Over the past 10 years, MPFRY has outperformed IBM with an annualized return of 15.87%, while IBM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.27% annualized return.


MPFRY

1D
0.00%
1M
-5.10%
6M
-0.30%
YTD
7.40%
1Y
15.78%
3Y*
36.11%
5Y*
24.85%
10Y*
15.87%
ALL TIME*
12.06%

IBM

1D
0.86%
1M
-22.75%
6M
-26.12%
YTD
-23.51%
1Y
-8.27%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
15.08%
10Y*
8.27%
ALL TIME*
7.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.40B$3.19B$2.85B
$660.62$875.83$8.18K

MPFRY vs. IBM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MPFRY
Mapfre SA ADR
7.40%87.16%23.10%25.29%1.27%7.26%-22.27%6.23%-2.87%19.56%
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
-23.51%38.23%39.27%21.85%10.64%16.65%-1.16%23.58%-22.56%-3.99%

Correlation

The correlation between MPFRY and IBM is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2012

0.02

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MPFRY:

$7.29B

IBM:

$210.71B

Total Revenue (TTM)

MPFRY:

€31.61B

IBM:

$69.10B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MPFRY:

€31.61B

IBM:

$40.57B

EBITDA (TTM)

MPFRY:

€0.00

IBM:

$14.95B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Mapfre SA ADR

Return for Risk

MPFRY vs. IBM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MPFRY
MPFRY Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
MPFRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPFRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPFRY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
MPFRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPFRY Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

IBM
IBM Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
IBM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBM Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IBM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBM Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MPFRY vs. IBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mapfre SA ADR (MPFRY) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MPFRYIBMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.01

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

-0.25

+1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.93

-0.59

+2.52

MPFRY vs. IBM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPFRY Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is higher than the IBM Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPFRY and IBM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MPFRY vs. IBM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPFRY drawdown since its inception was -87.32%, which is greater than IBM's maximum drawdown of -69.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPFRY and IBM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPFRYIBMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.32%

-69.40%

-17.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.76%

-37.50%

+16.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.76%

-37.50%

+16.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.07%

-37.50%

+5.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.60%

-40.59%

-17.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.98%

-32.07%

-7.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.17%

-20.13%

-38.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.18%

15.98%

-7.80%

Volatility

MPFRY vs. IBM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mapfre SA ADR (MPFRY) is 4.30%, while International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) has a volatility of 31.22%. This indicates that MPFRY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPFRYIBMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.30%

31.22%

-26.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.73%

46.22%

-16.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.34%

48.19%

-1.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.35%

30.02%

+16.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.35%

28.05%

+16.30%

Dividends

MPFRY vs. IBM - Dividend Comparison

MPFRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than IBM's 3.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
3.01%2.27%3.03%4.05%4.68%4.74%5.17%4.80%5.46%3.85%3.31%3.63%
MPFRY
Mapfre SA ADR
4.42%4.19%6.62%7.11%8.00%6.72%6.37%4.88%5.49%7.43%6.33%4.42%

Financials

MPFRY vs. IBM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mapfre SA ADR and International Business Machines Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MPFRY and IBM have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBM has higher volatility (31.22%) compared to MPFRY (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPFRY dropped -87.32% vs IBM's -69.40%.

MPFRY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MPFRY and IBM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer