PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MP vs. PLL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


MPPLL
YTD Return2.82%-56.98%
1Y Return36.61%-52.62%
3Y Return (Ann)-24.05%-42.82%
Sharpe Ratio0.59-0.59
Sortino Ratio1.24-0.64
Omega Ratio1.150.94
Calmar Ratio0.41-0.60
Martin Ratio1.34-0.98
Ulcer Index25.11%56.23%
Daily Std Dev56.78%93.04%
Max Drawdown-81.99%-91.82%
Current Drawdown-64.97%-85.14%

Fundamentals


MPPLL
Market Cap$3.18B$235.97M
EPS-$0.52-$2.03
Total Revenue (TTM)$121.15M$19.32M
Gross Profit (TTM)$6.61M-$16.77M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between MP and PLL is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

MP vs. PLL - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MP achieves a 2.82% return, which is significantly higher than PLL's -56.98% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.80%
-22.35%
MP
PLL

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MP vs. PLL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MP Materials Corp. (MP) and Piedmont Lithium Inc. (PLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MP
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MP, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.59
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MP, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.24
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MP, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.15
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MP, currently valued at 0.41, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.41
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MP, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.34
PLL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PLL, currently valued at -0.59, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.59
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PLL, currently valued at -0.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.64
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PLL, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.94
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PLL, currently valued at -0.60, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.60
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PLL, currently valued at -0.98, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.98

MP vs. PLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MP Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is higher than the PLL Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MP and PLL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.59
-0.59
MP
PLL

Dividends

MP vs. PLL - Dividend Comparison

Neither MP nor PLL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MP vs. PLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MP drawdown since its inception was -81.99%, smaller than the maximum PLL drawdown of -91.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MP and PLL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-90.00%-85.00%-80.00%-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-64.97%
-85.14%
MP
PLL

Volatility

MP vs. PLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MP Materials Corp. (MP) is 13.50%, while Piedmont Lithium Inc. (PLL) has a volatility of 32.51%. This indicates that MP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
13.50%
32.51%
MP
PLL

Financials

MP vs. PLL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MP Materials Corp. and Piedmont Lithium Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items