PortfoliosLab logo
MP vs. PLL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MP and PLL is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Performance

MP vs. PLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MP Materials Corp. (MP) and Piedmont Lithium Inc. (PLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
160.10%
50.51%
MP
PLL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MP:

0.93

PLL:

-0.26

Sortino Ratio

MP:

1.79

PLL:

0.24

Omega Ratio

MP:

1.21

PLL:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

MP:

0.77

PLL:

-0.25

Martin Ratio

MP:

3.57

PLL:

-0.57

Ulcer Index

MP:

17.75%

PLL:

41.10%

Daily Std Dev

MP:

68.01%

PLL:

91.03%

Max Drawdown

MP:

-81.99%

PLL:

-93.46%

Current Drawdown

MP:

-55.36%

PLL:

-89.10%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MP:

$3.74B

PLL:

$156.90M

EPS

MP:

-$0.57

PLL:

-$3.30

PS Ratio

MP:

18.35

PLL:

1.57

PB Ratio

MP:

3.54

PLL:

0.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

MP:

$155.17M

PLL:

$86.48M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MP:

$14.23M

PLL:

$10.10M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MP achieves a 66.73% return, which is significantly higher than PLL's 1.95% return.


MP

YTD

66.73%

1M

-3.42%

6M

40.22%

1Y

65.25%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

PLL

YTD

1.95%

1M

30.65%

6M

-28.38%

1Y

-19.80%

5Y*

12.11%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MP vs. PLL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MP is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MP is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MP is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MP is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MP is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MP is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

PLL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PLL is 4141
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PLL is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PLL is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PLL is 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PLL is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PLL is 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MP vs. PLL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MP Materials Corp. (MP) and Piedmont Lithium Inc. (PLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for MP, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
MP: 0.93
PLL: -0.23
The chart of Sortino ratio for MP, currently valued at 1.79, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
MP: 1.79
PLL: 0.30
The chart of Omega ratio for MP, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
MP: 1.21
PLL: 1.03
The chart of Calmar ratio for MP, currently valued at 0.77, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
MP: 0.77
PLL: -0.22
The chart of Martin ratio for MP, currently valued at 3.57, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
MP: 3.57
PLL: -0.50

The current MP Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is higher than the PLL Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MP and PLL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.93
-0.23
MP
PLL

Dividends

MP vs. PLL - Dividend Comparison

Neither MP nor PLL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MP vs. PLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MP drawdown since its inception was -81.99%, smaller than the maximum PLL drawdown of -93.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MP and PLL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-90.00%-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-55.36%
-89.10%
MP
PLL

Volatility

MP vs. PLL - Volatility Comparison

MP Materials Corp. (MP) has a higher volatility of 35.62% compared to Piedmont Lithium Inc. (PLL) at 29.53%. This indicates that MP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
35.62%
29.53%
MP
PLL

Financials

MP vs. PLL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MP Materials Corp. and Piedmont Lithium Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items