PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
MP vs. BHP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

MP vs. BHP

Last updated May 14, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about MP Materials Corp. (MP) and BHP Group (BHP).

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MP or BHP.

Correlation

The correlation between MP and BHP is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

MP vs. BHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MP Materials Corp. (MP) and BHP Group (BHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MP:

0.40

BHP:

-0.23

Sortino Ratio

MP:

1.13

BHP:

-0.13

Omega Ratio

MP:

1.13

BHP:

0.98

Calmar Ratio

MP:

0.33

BHP:

-0.18

Martin Ratio

MP:

1.51

BHP:

-0.43

Ulcer Index

MP:

18.06%

BHP:

15.63%

Daily Std Dev

MP:

68.63%

BHP:

29.16%

Max Drawdown

MP:

-81.99%

BHP:

-75.95%

Current Drawdown

MP:

-64.35%

BHP:

-20.68%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MP:

$3.46B

BHP:

$126.61B

EPS

MP:

-$0.63

BHP:

$4.48

PS Ratio

MP:

16.00

BHP:

2.39

PB Ratio

MP:

3.34

BHP:

2.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

MP:

$155.17M

BHP:

$53.75B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MP:

$14.23M

BHP:

$31.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

MP:

-$50.45M

BHP:

$25.71B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MP achieves a 33.14% return, which is significantly higher than BHP's 6.15% return.

MP

YTD

33.14%

1M

-8.42%

6M

4.63%

1Y

27.03%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BHP

YTD

6.15%

1M

12.29%

6M

-1.46%

1Y

-6.78%

5Y*

14.96%

10Y*

8.21%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MP vs. BHP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MP is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MP is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MP is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MP is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MP is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MP is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
BHP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BHP is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BHP is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BHP is 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BHP is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BHP is 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BHP is 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MP vs. BHP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MP Materials Corp. (MP) and BHP Group (BHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MP Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the BHP Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MP and BHP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading data...

Dividends

MP vs. BHP - Dividend Comparison

MP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MP
MP Materials Corp.		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BHP
BHP Group		4.88%5.98%4.98%9.95%9.98%3.67%8.59%4.89%3.61%1.68%9.32%5.11%

Drawdowns

MP vs. BHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MP drawdown since its inception was -81.99%, which is greater than BHP's maximum drawdown of -75.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MP and BHP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Loading data...

Volatility

MP vs. BHP - Volatility Comparison

MP Materials Corp. (MP) has a higher volatility of 33.62% compared to BHP Group (BHP) at 6.56%. This indicates that MP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading data...

Financials

MP vs. BHP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MP Materials Corp. and BHP Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00BAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
60.99M
25.18B
(MP) Total Revenue
(BHP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MP vs. BHP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MP Materials Corp. and BHP Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual
-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
-31.8%
35.4%
(MP) Gross Margin
(BHP) Gross Margin
MP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MP Materials Corp. reported a gross profit of -19.40M and revenue of 60.99M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -31.8%.

BHP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, BHP Group reported a gross profit of 8.92B and revenue of 25.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.4%.

MP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MP Materials Corp. reported an operating income of -43.96M and revenue of 60.99M, resulting in an operating margin of -72.1%.

BHP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, BHP Group reported an operating income of 8.92B and revenue of 25.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.4%.

MP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MP Materials Corp. reported a net income of -22.34M and revenue of 60.99M, resulting in a net margin of -36.6%.

BHP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, BHP Group reported a net income of 4.42B and revenue of 25.18B, resulting in a net margin of 17.5%.