PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MOTE vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MOTE and BDGS is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

MOTE vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar ESG Moat ETF (MOTE) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.33%
9.30%
MOTE
BDGS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MOTE:

0.74

BDGS:

4.00

Sortino Ratio

MOTE:

1.08

BDGS:

7.08

Omega Ratio

MOTE:

1.13

BDGS:

2.24

Calmar Ratio

MOTE:

1.15

BDGS:

8.75

Martin Ratio

MOTE:

2.85

BDGS:

38.33

Ulcer Index

MOTE:

3.05%

BDGS:

0.55%

Daily Std Dev

MOTE:

11.81%

BDGS:

5.24%

Max Drawdown

MOTE:

-28.13%

BDGS:

-5.38%

Current Drawdown

MOTE:

-4.76%

BDGS:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOTE achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's 2.71% return.


MOTE

YTD

0.61%

1M

-0.45%

6M

2.67%

1Y

9.91%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BDGS

YTD

2.71%

1M

1.02%

6M

9.23%

1Y

20.89%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MOTE vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
Expense ratio chart for BDGS: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%
Expense ratio chart for MOTE: current value at 0.49% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.49%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MOTE vs. BDGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOTE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MOTE is 3030
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MOTE is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MOTE is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MOTE is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MOTE is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MOTE is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

BDGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDGS is 9898
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MOTE vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar ESG Moat ETF (MOTE) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MOTE, currently valued at 0.74, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.744.00
The chart of Sortino ratio for MOTE, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.087.08
The chart of Omega ratio for MOTE, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.132.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for MOTE, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.158.75
The chart of Martin ratio for MOTE, currently valued at 2.85, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.8538.33
MOTE
BDGS

The current MOTE Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 4.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOTE and BDGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.74
4.00
MOTE
BDGS

Dividends

MOTE vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

MOTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than BDGS's 1.76% yield.


TTM2024202320222021
MOTE
VanEck Morningstar ESG Moat ETF
0.94%0.95%1.13%0.98%0.19%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
1.76%1.81%0.84%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MOTE vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTE drawdown since its inception was -28.13%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTE and BDGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-4.76%
0
MOTE
BDGS

Volatility

MOTE vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Morningstar ESG Moat ETF (MOTE) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 0.93%. This indicates that MOTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.84%
0.93%
MOTE
BDGS
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab