MOS vs. SLB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about The Mosaic Company (MOS) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB).

Performance

MOS vs. SLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Mosaic Company (MOS) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MOS vs. SLB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MOS The Mosaic Company	6.75%	1.10%	-29.14%	-16.42%	12.80%	72.15%	7.60%	-25.28%	14.22%	-10.38%
SLB Schlumberger Limited	34.69%	3.27%	-24.47%	-0.78%	81.15%	40.30%	-43.81%	17.73%	-44.66%	-17.37%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MOS : $8.09B SLB : $76.47B
EPS MOS : $1.70 SLB : $2.31
PE Ratio MOS : 15.02 SLB : 22.20
PEG Ratio MOS : 0.31 SLB : 1.05
PS Ratio MOS : 0.67 SLB : 2.08
PB Ratio MOS : 0.67 SLB : 2.07
Total Revenue (TTM) MOS : $12.05B SLB : $35.71B
Gross Profit (TTM) MOS : $1.90B SLB : $6.50B
EBITDA (TTM) MOS : $2.33B SLB : $7.15B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOS achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than SLB's 34.69% return. Over the past 10 years, MOS has outperformed SLB with an annualized return of 1.41%, while SLB has yielded a comparatively lower -0.51% annualized return.

MOS

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: -7.63%
• YTD: 6.75%
• 6M: -25.17%
• 1Y: -2.68%
• 3Y*: -15.39%
• 5Y*: -1.82%
• 10Y*: 1.41%

SLB

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: 34.69%
• 6M: 51.59%
• 1Y: 26.70%
• 3Y*: 4.15%
• 5Y*: 15.31%
• 10Y*: -0.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MOS vs. SLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOS

MOS Risk / Return Rank: 38
MOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
MOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
MOS Omega Ratio Rank: 36
MOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
MOS Martin Ratio Rank: 40

SLB

SLB Risk / Return Rank: 63
SLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
SLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
SLB Omega Ratio Rank: 61
SLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SLB Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOS vs. SLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Mosaic Company (MOS) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MOS	SLB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.06	0.68	-0.74
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.22	1.17	-0.95
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.16	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.10	1.09	-1.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.17	1.85	-2.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MOS vs. SLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOS Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the SLB Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOS and SLB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MOS	SLB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06	0.68	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.04	0.40	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03	-0.01	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	0.13	-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between MOS and SLB is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

MOS vs. SLB - Dividend Comparison

MOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, more than SLB's 2.24% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MOS The Mosaic Company	3.45%	3.65%	3.42%	2.94%	1.28%	0.70%	0.87%	0.81%	0.34%	2.34%	3.75%	3.90%
SLB Schlumberger Limited	2.24%	2.97%	2.87%	1.92%	1.22%	2.09%	4.01%	4.98%	5.54%	2.97%	2.38%	2.87%

Drawdowns

MOS vs. SLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOS drawdown since its inception was -94.71%, which is greater than SLB's maximum drawdown of -87.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOS and SLB.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOS	SLB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.71%	-87.64%	-7.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.16%	-24.29%	-12.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-68.69%	-46.63%	-22.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.82%	-84.29%	+3.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-78.24%	-39.51%	-38.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-61.06%	-31.17%	-29.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.54%	14.34%	+6.20%

Volatility

MOS vs. SLB - Volatility Comparison

The Mosaic Company (MOS) has a higher volatility of 22.73% compared to Schlumberger Limited (SLB) at 14.74%. This indicates that MOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MOS	SLB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.73%	14.74%	+7.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.47%	26.09%	+8.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.07%	39.65%	+4.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.71%	38.16%	+3.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.99%	40.36%	+4.63%

Financials

MOS vs. SLB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Mosaic Company and Schlumberger Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MOS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Mosaic Company reported a gross profit of 342.60M and revenue of 2.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

SLB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported a gross profit of 1.73B and revenue of 9.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.7%.

MOS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Mosaic Company reported an operating income of -101.20M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in an operating margin of -3.4%.

SLB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported an operating income of 1.46B and revenue of 9.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.0%.

MOS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Mosaic Company reported a net income of -519.50M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in a net margin of -17.5%.

SLB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported a net income of 800.00M and revenue of 9.75B, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.