PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOS vs. FMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MOS vs. FMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Mosaic Company (MOS) and FMC Corporation (FMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOS achieves a -1.47% return, which is significantly higher than FMC's -4.88% return. Over the past 10 years, MOS has outperformed FMC with an annualized return of 0.55%, while FMC has yielded a comparatively lower -7.59% annualized return.


MOS

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.67%
YTD
-1.47%
6M
-1.75%
1Y
-34.05%
3Y*
-8.32%
5Y*
-6.82%
10Y*
0.55%

FMC

1D
-1.57%
1M
-11.40%
YTD
-4.88%
6M
-3.15%
1Y
-65.70%
3Y*
-48.30%
5Y*
-33.47%
10Y*
-7.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOS vs. FMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MOS
The Mosaic Company
-1.47%1.10%-29.14%-16.42%12.80%72.15%7.60%-25.28%14.22%-10.38%
FMC
FMC Corporation
-4.88%-69.98%-19.72%-48.02%15.70%-2.59%17.32%84.70%-20.97%68.80%

Correlation

The correlation between MOS and FMC is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2004

0.51

The correlation between MOS and FMC shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MOS:

$7.40B

FMC:

$1.65B

EPS

MOS:

$2.32

FMC:

-$19.99

PS Ratio

MOS:

0.60

FMC:

0.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

MOS:

$12.06B

FMC:

$3.43B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MOS:

$1.68B

FMC:

$1.21B

EBITDA (TTM)

MOS:

$1.94B

FMC:

-$395.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOS vs. FMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOS
MOS Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
MOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOS Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOS Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

FMC
FMC Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMC Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOS vs. FMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Mosaic Company (MOS) and FMC Corporation (FMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MOSFMCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.81

-0.96

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.01

-1.30

+0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.78

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

-0.92

+0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.30

-1.27

-0.03

MOS vs. FMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOS Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is comparable to the FMC Sharpe Ratio of -0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOS and FMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MOSFMCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.81

-0.96

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

-0.71

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

-0.19

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.02

+0.06

Drawdowns

MOS vs. FMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOS drawdown since its inception was -94.71%, which is greater than FMC's maximum drawdown of -90.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOS and FMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOSFMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.71%

-90.07%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.01%

-72.12%

+30.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.35%

-87.81%

+42.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.65%

-90.07%

+20.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.82%

-90.07%

+9.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.91%

-89.19%

+9.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.21%

-36.56%

-24.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.29%

52.06%

-26.77%

Volatility

MOS vs. FMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Mosaic Company (MOS) is 10.22%, while FMC Corporation (FMC) has a volatility of 15.53%. This indicates that MOS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOSFMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.22%

15.53%

-5.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.31%

43.19%

-9.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.44%

68.54%

-26.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.72%

47.02%

-5.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.92%

41.08%

+3.84%

Dividends

MOS vs. FMC - Dividend Comparison

MOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, less than FMC's 10.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMC
FMC Corporation
10.05%13.12%4.77%3.68%1.74%1.79%1.57%12.47%1.21%0.70%1.17%1.69%
MOS
The Mosaic Company
4.72%3.65%3.42%2.94%1.28%0.70%0.87%0.81%0.34%2.34%3.75%3.90%

Financials

MOS vs. FMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Mosaic Company and FMC Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
3.00B
758.60M
(MOS) Total Revenue
(FMC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MOS vs. FMC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Mosaic Company and FMC Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
7.9%
32.5%
Portfolio components
MOS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Mosaic Company reported a gross profit of 235.60M and revenue of 3.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.9%.

FMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FMC Corporation reported a gross profit of 246.60M and revenue of 758.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.5%.

MOS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Mosaic Company reported an operating income of -372.90M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in an operating margin of -12.4%.

FMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FMC Corporation reported an operating income of 3.40M and revenue of 758.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.5%.

MOS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Mosaic Company reported a net income of -257.60M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in a net margin of -8.6%.

FMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FMC Corporation reported a net income of -281.30M and revenue of 758.60M, resulting in a net margin of -37.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MOS and FMC have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMC has higher volatility (15.53%) compared to MOS (10.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOS dropped -94.71% vs FMC's -90.07%.

MOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.81 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOS and FMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer