MOON vs. SMH
MOON (Direxion Moonshot Innovators ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOON is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Moonshots Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MOON charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
MOON vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MOON
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- 4.01%
- 1M
- 24.01%
- YTD
- 75.55%
- 6M
- 76.44%
- 1Y
- 160.66%
- 3Y*
- 63.68%
- 5Y*
- 39.58%
- 10Y*
- 37.55%
MOON vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOON Direxion Moonshot Innovators ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | -8.56% | 9.85% | -61.07% | -13.78% | 24.70% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 75.55% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 13.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOON and SMH is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2020 | 0.45 |
The correlation between MOON and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (3 years) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MOON vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MOON
SMH
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
MOON
SMH
Healthcare
MOON
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
MOON
SMH
-
Communication Services
MOON
SMH
-
Industrials
MOON
SMH
-
Financial Services
MOON
SMH
-
Basic Materials
MOON
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
MOON
-
SMH
-
Energy
MOON
-
SMH
-
Real Estate
MOON
-
SMH
-
Utilities
MOON
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOON vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
MOON
SMH
MOON vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Moonshot Innovators ETF (MOON) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MOON | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.34 | — |
Drawdowns
MOON vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOON | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -84.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -41.09% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.89% | — |
Volatility
MOON vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOON | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 30.57% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 35.02% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 32.58% | — |
MOON vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOON has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOON vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
MOON has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOON Direxion Moonshot Innovators ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 1.41% | 0.00% | 1.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOON and SMH have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for MOON.
SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.00% for MOON.
MOON is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. MOON tracks S&P Kensho Moonshots Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for MOON and 0.35% for SMH.
Find the right allocation for MOON and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer