PortfoliosLab logo
MOH vs. AGM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MOH and AGM is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

MOH vs. AGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Molina Healthcare, Inc. (MOH) and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MOH:

-0.01

AGM:

0.32

Sortino Ratio

MOH:

0.13

AGM:

0.74

Omega Ratio

MOH:

1.02

AGM:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

MOH:

-0.16

AGM:

0.47

Martin Ratio

MOH:

-0.47

AGM:

0.99

Ulcer Index

MOH:

12.39%

AGM:

10.72%

Daily Std Dev

MOH:

45.23%

AGM:

29.93%

Max Drawdown

MOH:

-68.37%

AGM:

-94.63%

Current Drawdown

MOH:

-27.29%

AGM:

-12.61%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MOH:

$16.47B

AGM:

$1.95B

EPS

MOH:

$20.88

AGM:

$16.18

PE Ratio

MOH:

14.55

AGM:

11.67

PEG Ratio

MOH:

-0.62

AGM:

1.56

PS Ratio

MOH:

0.41

AGM:

5.46

PB Ratio

MOH:

3.79

AGM:

1.85

Total Revenue (TTM)

MOH:

$41.85B

AGM:

$784.95M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MOH:

$4.78B

AGM:

$499.84M

EBITDA (TTM)

MOH:

$1.90B

AGM:

$845.76M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOH achieves a 4.81% return, which is significantly higher than AGM's -4.60% return. Over the past 10 years, MOH has underperformed AGM with an annualized return of 15.80%, while AGM has yielded a comparatively higher 23.40% annualized return.


MOH

YTD

4.81%

1M

-6.72%

6M

2.40%

1Y

-0.33%

3Y*

1.67%

5Y*

10.42%

10Y*

15.80%

AGM

YTD

-4.60%

1M

6.33%

6M

-11.39%

1Y

9.40%

3Y*

24.92%

5Y*

28.06%

10Y*

23.40%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Molina Healthcare, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MOH vs. AGM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MOH is 4242
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MOH is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MOH is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MOH is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MOH is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MOH is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

AGM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AGM is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AGM is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AGM is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AGM is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AGM is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AGM is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MOH vs. AGM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Molina Healthcare, Inc. (MOH) and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MOH Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the AGM Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOH and AGM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

MOH vs. AGM - Dividend Comparison

MOH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MOH
Molina Healthcare, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AGM
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation
3.06%2.84%2.30%3.37%2.84%4.31%3.35%3.84%1.84%1.82%2.03%1.85%

Drawdowns

MOH vs. AGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOH drawdown since its inception was -68.37%, smaller than the maximum AGM drawdown of -94.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOH and AGM.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

MOH vs. AGM - Volatility Comparison

Molina Healthcare, Inc. (MOH) has a higher volatility of 10.30% compared to Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) at 8.59%. This indicates that MOH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

MOH vs. AGM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Molina Healthcare, Inc. and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20212022202320242025
11.15B
384.79M
(MOH) Total Revenue
(AGM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MOH vs. AGM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Molina Healthcare, Inc. and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
11.5%
24.5%
(MOH) Gross Margin
(AGM) Gross Margin
MOH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Molina Healthcare, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.28B and revenue of 11.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

AGM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a gross profit of 94.32M and revenue of 384.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.

MOH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Molina Healthcare, Inc. reported an operating income of 433.00M and revenue of 11.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.9%.

AGM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported an operating income of 64.81M and revenue of 384.79M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.8%.

MOH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Molina Healthcare, Inc. reported a net income of 298.00M and revenue of 11.15B, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.

AGM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a net income of 49.65M and revenue of 384.79M, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.