MOH vs. AGM
MOH (Molina Healthcare, Inc.) is a stock, while AGM (Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, MOH returned 8.47%/yr vs 18.81%/yr for AGM. At 0.23, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MOH vs. AGM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOH achieves a -18.45% return, which is significantly lower than AGM's -12.71% return. Over the past 10 years, MOH has underperformed AGM with an annualized return of 8.47%, while AGM has yielded a comparatively higher 18.81% annualized return.
MOH
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- YTD
- -18.45%
- 6M
- -30.37%
- 1Y
- -58.42%
- 3Y*
- -20.86%
- 5Y*
- -9.31%
- 10Y*
- 8.47%
AGM
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -4.86%
- YTD
- -12.71%
- 6M
- -1.92%
- 1Y
- -6.53%
- 3Y*
- 7.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.16%
- 10Y*
- 18.81%
MOH vs. AGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOH Molina Healthcare, Inc. | -18.45% | -40.37% | -19.45% | 9.41% | 3.82% | 49.56% | 56.74% | 16.75% | 51.56% | 41.32% |
AGM Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation | -12.71% | -7.96% | 6.08% | 74.61% | -5.83% | 72.62% | -6.60% | 43.16% | -20.38% | 39.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOH and AGM is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners. Combining low-correlation assets is one of the most reliable ways to reduce portfolio risk without sacrificing expected returns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2003 | 0.23 |
Fundamentals
MOH:
$8.92
AGM:
$24.96
MOH:
15.86
AGM:
6.08
MOH:
6.42
AGM:
0.45
MOH:
0.16
AGM:
0.69
MOH:
$45.43B
AGM:
$1.61B
MOH:
$3.37B
AGM:
$0.00
MOH:
$976.00M
AGM:
$0.00
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOH vs. AGM — Risk / Return Rank
MOH
AGM
MOH vs. AGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Molina Healthcare, Inc. (MOH) and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MOH | AGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | -0.21 | -0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | -0.06 | -1.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 0.99 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | -0.38 | -0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | -0.77 | -0.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MOH | AGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.01 | -0.21 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | 0.41 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.54 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.31 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
MOH vs. AGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOH drawdown since its inception was -70.76%, smaller than the maximum AGM drawdown of -94.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOH and AGM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOH | AGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.76% | -94.63% | +23.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.81% | -31.94% | -32.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.76% | -32.54% | -38.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.76% | -53.30% | -17.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.26% | -26.41% | -39.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.33% | -27.93% | +3.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.95% | 15.68% | +30.27% |
Volatility
MOH vs. AGM - Volatility Comparison
Molina Healthcare, Inc. (MOH) has a higher volatility of 12.13% compared to Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) at 8.49%. This indicates that MOH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MOH | AGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.13% | 8.49% | +3.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.88% | 24.76% | +21.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.26% | 32.34% | +25.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.97% | 30.03% | +8.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.87% | 34.65% | +6.22% |
Dividends
MOH vs. AGM - Dividend Comparison
MOH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOH Molina Healthcare, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AGM Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation | 4.02% | 3.42% | 2.84% | 2.30% | 3.37% | 2.84% | 4.31% | 3.35% | 3.84% | 1.84% | 1.82% | 2.03% |
Financials
MOH vs. AGM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Molina Healthcare, Inc. and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MOH vs. AGM - Profitability Comparison
MOH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Molina Healthcare, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 11.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
AGM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a gross profit of -284.04M and revenue of 401.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -70.7%.
MOH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Molina Healthcare, Inc. reported an operating income of -162.00M and revenue of 11.38B, resulting in an operating margin of -1.4%.
AGM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported an operating income of -195.25M and revenue of 401.81M, resulting in an operating margin of -48.6%.
MOH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Molina Healthcare, Inc. reported a net income of -160.00M and revenue of 11.38B, resulting in a net margin of -1.4%.
AGM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a net income of 23.00M and revenue of 401.81M, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.