PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MOAT vs. VONG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MOAT and VONG is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

MOAT vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
7.19%
11.09%
MOAT
VONG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MOAT:

1.31

VONG:

1.98

Sortino Ratio

MOAT:

1.80

VONG:

2.58

Omega Ratio

MOAT:

1.23

VONG:

1.35

Calmar Ratio

MOAT:

2.35

VONG:

2.65

Martin Ratio

MOAT:

6.00

VONG:

10.08

Ulcer Index

MOAT:

2.59%

VONG:

3.45%

Daily Std Dev

MOAT:

11.83%

VONG:

17.60%

Max Drawdown

MOAT:

-33.31%

VONG:

-32.72%

Current Drawdown

MOAT:

-3.38%

VONG:

-2.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOAT achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 1.37% return. Over the past 10 years, MOAT has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 13.81%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.82% annualized return.


MOAT

YTD

1.50%

1M

0.56%

6M

7.19%

1Y

13.61%

5Y*

12.31%

10Y*

13.81%

VONG

YTD

1.37%

1M

-0.14%

6M

11.09%

1Y

31.07%

5Y*

18.16%

10Y*

16.82%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MOAT vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOAT has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.08% expense ratio.


MOAT
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
Expense ratio chart for MOAT: current value at 0.48% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.48%
Expense ratio chart for VONG: current value at 0.08% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.08%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MOAT vs. VONG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MOAT is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MOAT is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MOAT is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MOAT is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MOAT is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MOAT is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

VONG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VONG is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VONG is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VONG is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VONG is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VONG is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VONG is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MOAT vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MOAT, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.311.98
The chart of Sortino ratio for MOAT, currently valued at 1.80, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.802.58
The chart of Omega ratio for MOAT, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.231.35
The chart of Calmar ratio for MOAT, currently valued at 2.35, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.352.65
The chart of Martin ratio for MOAT, currently valued at 6.00, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.0010.08
MOAT
VONG

The current MOAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOAT and VONG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.31
1.98
MOAT
VONG

Dividends

MOAT vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than VONG's 0.55% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MOAT
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.35%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.45%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%1.34%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.55%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%1.43%

Drawdowns

MOAT vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, roughly equal to the maximum VONG drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT and VONG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-3.38%
-2.75%
MOAT
VONG

Volatility

MOAT vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) is 4.39%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that MOAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.39%
6.31%
MOAT
VONG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab