PortfoliosLab logo
MOAT vs. RIO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MOAT and RIO is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.5

Performance

MOAT vs. RIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
390.61%
161.30%
MOAT
RIO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MOAT:

0.08

RIO:

-0.09

Sortino Ratio

MOAT:

0.24

RIO:

0.05

Omega Ratio

MOAT:

1.03

RIO:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

MOAT:

0.07

RIO:

-0.09

Martin Ratio

MOAT:

0.26

RIO:

-0.18

Ulcer Index

MOAT:

5.41%

RIO:

11.81%

Daily Std Dev

MOAT:

18.18%

RIO:

24.59%

Max Drawdown

MOAT:

-33.31%

RIO:

-88.97%

Current Drawdown

MOAT:

-12.72%

RIO:

-10.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOAT achieves a -8.31% return, which is significantly lower than RIO's 8.72% return. Over the past 10 years, MOAT has outperformed RIO with an annualized return of 11.96%, while RIO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.26% annualized return.


MOAT

YTD

-8.31%

1M

-5.53%

6M

-10.13%

1Y

0.49%

5Y*

13.66%

10Y*

11.96%

RIO

YTD

8.72%

1M

-1.78%

6M

-1.04%

1Y

-3.44%

5Y*

14.91%

10Y*

11.26%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MOAT vs. RIO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MOAT is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MOAT is 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MOAT is 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MOAT is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MOAT is 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MOAT is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

RIO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RIO is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RIO is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RIO is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RIO is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RIO is 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RIO is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MOAT vs. RIO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for MOAT, currently valued at 0.08, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
MOAT: 0.08
RIO: -0.09
The chart of Sortino ratio for MOAT, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
MOAT: 0.24
RIO: 0.05
The chart of Omega ratio for MOAT, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
MOAT: 1.03
RIO: 1.01
The chart of Calmar ratio for MOAT, currently valued at 0.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
MOAT: 0.07
RIO: -0.09
The chart of Martin ratio for MOAT, currently valued at 0.26, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
MOAT: 0.26
RIO: -0.18

The current MOAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is higher than the RIO Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOAT and RIO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.08
-0.09
MOAT
RIO

Dividends

MOAT vs. RIO - Dividend Comparison

MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than RIO's 6.52% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MOAT
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.49%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%1.34%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
6.52%7.40%5.40%10.48%14.39%5.13%10.70%6.32%4.45%3.96%7.79%4.46%

Drawdowns

MOAT vs. RIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, smaller than the maximum RIO drawdown of -88.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT and RIO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-12.72%
-10.62%
MOAT
RIO

Volatility

MOAT vs. RIO - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a higher volatility of 14.08% compared to Rio Tinto Group (RIO) at 12.21%. This indicates that MOAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
14.08%
12.21%
MOAT
RIO