MNST vs. VRTS
MNST (Monster Beverage Corporation) and VRTS (Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.) are both stocks. MNST operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive), while VRTS operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, MNST returned 13.78%/yr vs 9.14%/yr for VRTS. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MNST vs. VRTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNST achieves a 21.33% return, which is significantly higher than VRTS's -11.09% return. Over the past 10 years, MNST has outperformed VRTS with an annualized return of 13.78%, while VRTS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.14% annualized return.
MNST
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- 7.18%
- YTD
- 21.33%
- 6M
- 19.78%
- 1Y
- 47.44%
- 3Y*
- 16.32%
- 5Y*
- 15.55%
- 10Y*
- 13.78%
VRTS
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- -11.09%
- 6M
- -11.85%
- 1Y
- -14.91%
- 3Y*
- -6.45%
- 5Y*
- -9.07%
- 10Y*
- 9.14%
MNST vs. VRTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 21.33% | 45.87% | -8.77% | 13.48% | 5.72% | 3.85% | 45.52% | 29.11% | -22.23% | 42.74% |
VRTS Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. | -11.09% | -22.12% | -5.56% | 30.90% | -33.50% | 38.98% | 82.52% | 56.62% | -29.81% | -0.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNST and VRTS is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009 | 0.26 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MNST and VRTS has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
MNST:
$91.93B
VRTS:
$956.72M
MNST:
$2.06
VRTS:
$16.98
MNST:
45.14
VRTS:
8.28
MNST:
10.43
VRTS:
1.21
MNST:
10.53
VRTS:
1.04
MNST:
$8.79B
VRTS:
$799.77M
MNST:
$4.88B
VRTS:
$646.06M
MNST:
$2.70B
VRTS:
$384.75M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNST vs. VRTS — Risk / Return Rank
MNST
VRTS
MNST vs. VRTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNST | VRTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 0.95 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | -0.38 | +3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.70 | -0.65 | +8.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNST vs. VRTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNST drawdown since its inception was -69.17%, smaller than the maximum VRTS drawdown of -74.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNST and VRTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNST | VRTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.17% | -74.36% | +5.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | -38.95% | +21.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.04% | -46.59% | +20.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.62% | -55.50% | +28.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.42% | -58.70% | +28.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -49.28% | +49.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.65% | -31.50% | +10.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.18% | 23.12% | -16.94% |
Volatility
MNST vs. VRTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is 4.97%, while Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) has a volatility of 9.43%. This indicates that MNST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNST | VRTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.97% | 9.43% | -4.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.90% | 25.92% | -6.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.42% | 34.64% | -8.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.63% | 35.88% | -11.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.26% | 38.61% | -12.35% |
Dividends
MNST vs. VRTS - Dividend Comparison
MNST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRTS Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. | 6.72% | 5.61% | 3.60% | 2.83% | 3.21% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.91% | 2.39% | 1.56% | 1.52% | 1.53% |
Financials
MNST vs. VRTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monster Beverage Corporation and Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MNST vs. VRTS - Profitability Comparison
MNST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.29B and revenue of 2.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.0%.
VRTS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. reported a gross profit of 131.82M and revenue of 186.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.9%.
MNST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported an operating income of 729.96M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.
VRTS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.23M and revenue of 186.04M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.8%.
MNST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a net income of 569.49M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in a net margin of 24.2%.
VRTS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. reported a net income of 7.13M and revenue of 186.04M, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MNST and VRTS have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VRTS has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to MNST (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNST dropped -69.17% vs VRTS's -74.36%.
MNST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MNST and VRTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer