MNST vs. QQQ

In the year-to-date period, MNST achieves a 19.62% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 0.69% return. Over the past 10 years, MNST has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 11.29%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 17.53% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MNST Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNST and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

MNST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%.

The maximum MNST drawdown since its inception was -69.17%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNST and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is 4.92%, while Invesco QQQ (QQQ) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that MNST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.