MNRO vs. GT
Compare and contrast key facts about Monro, Inc. (MNRO) and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MNRO or GT.
Key characteristics
| MNRO | GT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -2.85% | -43.30% |
| 1Y Return | 7.22% | -35.40% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -21.77% | -30.59% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -15.56% | -13.15% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -4.77% | -9.76% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.26 | -0.76 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.70 | -0.89 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.08 | 0.88 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.15 | -0.37 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.65 | -1.21 |
| Ulcer Index | 16.65% | 26.63% |
| Daily Std Dev | 41.93% | 41.82% |
| Max Drawdown | -73.52% | -94.50% |
| Current Drawdown | -64.98% | -85.67% |
Fundamentals
| MNRO | GT | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $828.10M | $2.34B |
| EPS | $0.87 | -$1.24 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.36 | 1.67 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $1.22B | $14.22B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $438.30M | $2.82B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $130.50M | $1.40B |
Correlation
The correlation between MNRO and GT is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MNRO vs. GT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MNRO achieves a -2.85% return, which is significantly higher than GT's -43.30% return. Over the past 10 years, MNRO has outperformed GT with an annualized return of -4.77%, while GT has yielded a comparatively lower -9.76% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MNRO vs. GT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monro, Inc. (MNRO) and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MNRO vs. GT - Dividend Comparison
MNRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, while GT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNRO Monro, Inc. | 4.05% | 3.82% | 2.43% | 1.68% | 1.65% | 1.10% | 1.13% | 1.25% | 1.15% | 0.88% | 0.87% | 0.59% |
GT The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.47% | 4.11% | 2.84% | 1.36% | 1.00% | 0.95% | 0.77% | 0.21% |
Drawdowns
MNRO vs. GT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNRO drawdown since its inception was -73.52%, smaller than the maximum GT drawdown of -94.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNRO and GT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MNRO vs. GT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Monro, Inc. (MNRO) is 8.26%, while The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) has a volatility of 11.52%. This indicates that MNRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MNRO vs. GT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monro, Inc. and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities