MNRO vs. GT
MNRO (Monro, Inc.) and GT (The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company) are both stocks. Both operate in the Auto Parts industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, MNRO returned -12.61%/yr vs -12.10%/yr for GT. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MNRO vs. GT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNRO achieves a -36.98% return, which is significantly lower than GT's -20.66% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MNRO having a -12.61% annualized return and GT not far ahead at -12.10%.
MNRO
- 1D
- -8.89%
- 1M
- -28.82%
- 6M
- -32.54%
- YTD
- -36.98%
- 1Y
- -7.54%
- 3Y*
- -26.57%
- 5Y*
- -23.76%
- 10Y*
- -12.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.58%
GT
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- 5.46%
- 6M
- -26.14%
- YTD
- -20.66%
- 1Y
- -31.12%
- 3Y*
- -24.27%
- 5Y*
- -15.05%
- 10Y*
- -12.10%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $55.08M | $73.99M | $64.15M | |
MNRO Monro, Inc. | $17.09M | $14.62M | $18.34M |
MNRO vs. GT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNRO Monro, Inc. | -36.98% | -13.81% | -11.99% | -33.10% | -20.59% | 11.13% | -30.65% | 15.00% | 22.21% | 0.97% |
GT The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company | -20.66% | -2.67% | -37.15% | 41.08% | -52.39% | 95.42% | -29.05% | -20.86% | -35.38% | 6.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNRO and GT is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 1991 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, MNRO and GT have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
MNRO:
$382.77M
GT:
$2.00B
MNRO:
$0.26
GT:
-$10.82
MNRO:
0.33
GT:
0.07
MNRO:
$1.14B
GT:
$17.91B
MNRO:
$398.75M
GT:
$2.63B
MNRO:
$60.51M
GT:
$832.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNRO vs. GT — Risk / Return Rank
MNRO
GT
MNRO vs. GT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monro, Inc. (MNRO) and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNRO | GT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.90 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | -0.69 | +0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | -1.14 | +0.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNRO vs. GT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNRO drawdown since its inception was -84.13%, smaller than the maximum GT drawdown of -94.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNRO and GT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNRO | GT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.13% | -94.50% | +10.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.96% | -47.06% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.77% | -62.80% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.69% | -76.88% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.13% | -86.55% | +2.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.77% | -87.76% | +4.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.43% | -48.80% | +22.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.99% | 28.48% | -8.49% |
Volatility
MNRO vs. GT - Volatility Comparison
Monro, Inc. (MNRO) has a higher volatility of 28.72% compared to The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) at 14.95%. This indicates that MNRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNRO | GT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.72% | 14.95% | +13.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.82% | 36.26% | +8.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.04% | 47.47% | +9.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.85% | 51.38% | -4.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.11% | 49.06% | -5.95% |
Dividends
MNRO vs. GT - Dividend Comparison
MNRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.14%, while GT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GT The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.47% | 4.11% | 2.84% | 1.36% | 1.00% | 0.77% |
MNRO Monro, Inc. | 9.14% | 5.59% | 4.52% | 3.82% | 2.43% | 1.68% | 1.65% | 1.10% | 1.13% | 1.25% | 1.15% | 0.88% |
Financials
MNRO vs. GT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monro, Inc. and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MNRO vs. GT - Profitability Comparison
MNRO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Monro, Inc. reported a gross profit of 100.40M and revenue of 287.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.0%.
GT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MNRO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Monro, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.70M and revenue of 287.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.
GT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
MNRO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Monro, Inc. reported a net income of -2.15M and revenue of 287.13M, resulting in a net margin of -0.8%.
GT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported a net income of -246.00M and revenue of 3.88B, resulting in a net margin of -6.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MNRO and GT have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MNRO has higher volatility (28.72%) compared to GT (14.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNRO dropped -84.13% vs GT's -94.50%.
MNRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.13 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MNRO and GT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer