MNRO vs. GT
Compare and contrast key facts about Monro, Inc. (MNRO) and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT).
Performance
MNRO vs. GT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNRO vs. GT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNRO Monro, Inc. | -18.96% | -13.81% | -11.99% | -33.10% | -20.59% | 11.13% | -30.65% | 15.00% | 22.21% | 0.97% |
GT The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company | -24.32% | -2.67% | -37.15% | 41.08% | -52.39% | 95.42% | -29.02% | -20.89% | -35.38% | 6.07% |
Fundamentals
MNRO:
$503.70M
GT:
$2.39M
MNRO:
-$0.41
GT:
-$8.93
MNRO:
0.42
GT:
0.07
MNRO:
0.83
GT:
0.00
MNRO:
$1.18B
GT:
$18.28B
MNRO:
$409.67M
GT:
$3.37B
MNRO:
$64.80M
GT:
$1.70B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNRO achieves a -18.96% return, which is significantly higher than GT's -24.32% return. Over the past 10 years, MNRO has outperformed GT with an annualized return of -11.71%, while GT has yielded a comparatively lower -13.90% annualized return.
MNRO
- 1D
- 3.55%
- 1M
- -25.50%
- YTD
- -18.96%
- 6M
- -8.26%
- 1Y
- 17.91%
- 3Y*
- -27.95%
- 5Y*
- -21.54%
- 10Y*
- -11.71%
GT
- 1D
- 5.41%
- 1M
- -19.64%
- YTD
- -24.32%
- 6M
- -11.36%
- 1Y
- -28.25%
- 3Y*
- -15.58%
- 5Y*
- -17.51%
- 10Y*
- -13.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNRO vs. GT — Risk / Return Rank
MNRO
GT
MNRO vs. GT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monro, Inc. (MNRO) and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNRO | GT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.27 | -0.55 | +0.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.90 | -0.56 | +1.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.93 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.20 | -0.51 | +0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.58 | -0.93 | +1.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNRO | GT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | -0.55 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.48 | -0.35 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.28 | -0.29 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | -0.01 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNRO and GT is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MNRO vs. GT - Dividend Comparison
MNRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.98%, while GT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNRO Monro, Inc. | 6.98% | 5.59% | 4.52% | 3.82% | 2.43% | 1.68% | 1.65% | 1.10% | 1.13% | 1.25% | 1.15% | 0.88% |
GT The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.47% | 4.11% | 2.84% | 1.36% | 1.00% | 0.77% |
Drawdowns
MNRO vs. GT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNRO drawdown since its inception was -84.13%, smaller than the maximum GT drawdown of -94.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNRO and GT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNRO | GT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.13% | -94.50% | +10.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.17% | -48.49% | +12.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.66% | -74.52% | -6.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.13% | -86.55% | +2.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.84% | -88.33% | +10.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.94% | -48.57% | +22.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.32% | 26.35% | -14.03% |
Volatility
MNRO vs. GT - Volatility Comparison
Monro, Inc. (MNRO) has a higher volatility of 16.19% compared to The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) at 13.09%. This indicates that MNRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNRO | GT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.19% | 13.09% | +3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.40% | 32.32% | +6.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.25% | 51.39% | +14.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.64% | 50.84% | -6.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.74% | 48.58% | -6.84% |
Financials
MNRO vs. GT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monro, Inc. and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MNRO vs. GT - Profitability Comparison
MNRO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Monro, Inc. reported a gross profit of 102.37M and revenue of 293.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.9%.
GT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported a gross profit of 1.03B and revenue of 4.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.9%.
MNRO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Monro, Inc. reported an operating income of 18.57M and revenue of 293.39M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.3%.
GT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported an operating income of 416.00M and revenue of 4.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.5%.
MNRO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Monro, Inc. reported a net income of 11.14M and revenue of 293.39M, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.
GT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported a net income of 105.00M and revenue of 4.92B, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.