PortfoliosLab logo
MNRO vs. GT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MNRO and GT is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

MNRO vs. GT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monro, Inc. (MNRO) and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MNRO:

-1.17

GT:

-0.31

Sortino Ratio

MNRO:

-1.89

GT:

0.03

Omega Ratio

MNRO:

0.78

GT:

1.00

Calmar Ratio

MNRO:

-0.61

GT:

-0.15

Martin Ratio

MNRO:

-1.90

GT:

-0.45

Ulcer Index

MNRO:

26.96%

GT:

28.02%

Daily Std Dev

MNRO:

45.45%

GT:

54.40%

Max Drawdown

MNRO:

-84.13%

GT:

-94.50%

Current Drawdown

MNRO:

-84.13%

GT:

-80.84%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MNRO:

$365.98M

GT:

$3.10B

EPS

MNRO:

$0.64

GT:

$0.24

PE Ratio

MNRO:

19.09

GT:

45.25

PEG Ratio

MNRO:

1.06

GT:

1.67

PS Ratio

MNRO:

0.30

GT:

0.17

PB Ratio

MNRO:

0.59

GT:

0.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

MNRO:

$900.34M

GT:

$18.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MNRO:

$320.37M

GT:

$3.62B

EBITDA (TTM)

MNRO:

$88.98M

GT:

$1.35B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNRO achieves a -49.97% return, which is significantly lower than GT's 20.67% return. Over the past 10 years, MNRO has underperformed GT with an annualized return of -13.33%, while GT has yielded a comparatively higher -9.04% annualized return.


MNRO

YTD

-49.97%

1M

-17.82%

6M

-57.62%

1Y

-51.73%

5Y*

-23.08%

10Y*

-13.33%

GT

YTD

20.67%

1M

12.31%

6M

8.71%

1Y

-16.20%

5Y*

10.55%

10Y*

-9.04%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MNRO vs. GT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNRO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MNRO is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MNRO is 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MNRO is 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MNRO is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MNRO is 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MNRO is 11
Martin Ratio Rank

GT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GT is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GT is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GT is 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GT is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GT is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GT is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MNRO vs. GT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monro, Inc. (MNRO) and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MNRO Sharpe Ratio is -1.17, which is lower than the GT Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNRO and GT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

MNRO vs. GT - Dividend Comparison

MNRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.17%, while GT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MNRO
Monro, Inc.
9.17%4.52%3.82%2.43%1.68%1.65%1.10%1.13%1.25%1.15%0.88%0.87%
GT
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.47%4.11%2.84%1.36%1.00%0.95%0.77%

Drawdowns

MNRO vs. GT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNRO drawdown since its inception was -84.13%, smaller than the maximum GT drawdown of -94.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNRO and GT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MNRO vs. GT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Monro, Inc. (MNRO) is 9.84%, while The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) has a volatility of 12.98%. This indicates that MNRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

MNRO vs. GT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monro, Inc. and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20212022202320242025
305.77M
4.25B
(MNRO) Total Revenue
(GT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MNRO vs. GT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Monro, Inc. and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20212022202320242025
34.3%
17.4%
(MNRO) Gross Margin
(GT) Gross Margin
MNRO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Monro, Inc. reported a gross profit of 104.80M and revenue of 305.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.3%.

GT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported a gross profit of 740.00M and revenue of 4.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.4%.

MNRO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Monro, Inc. reported an operating income of 9.96M and revenue of 305.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.

GT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported an operating income of 90.00M and revenue of 4.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.

MNRO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Monro, Inc. reported a net income of 4.58M and revenue of 305.77M, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.

GT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported a net income of 115.00M and revenue of 4.25B, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.