MNRO vs. GT

In the year-to-date period, MNRO achieves a -10.71% return, which is significantly higher than GT's -39.80% return. Over the past 10 years, MNRO has outperformed GT with an annualized return of -6.28%, while GT has yielded a comparatively lower -10.27% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monro, Inc. (MNRO) and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MNRO Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is higher than the GT Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNRO and GT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

MNRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, while GT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum MNRO drawdown since its inception was -73.52%, smaller than the maximum GT drawdown of -94.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNRO and GT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Monro, Inc. (MNRO) is 8.92%, while The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) has a volatility of 14.99%. This indicates that MNRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monro, Inc. and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.