PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNRO vs. ENZL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MNRO vs. ENZL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monro, Inc. (MNRO) and iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MNRO vs. ENZL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNRO
Monro, Inc.
-18.96%-13.81%-11.99%-33.10%-20.59%11.13%-30.65%15.00%22.21%0.97%
ENZL
iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF
-5.80%2.47%-4.86%2.95%-16.18%-11.39%20.04%30.09%0.35%24.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNRO achieves a -18.96% return, which is significantly lower than ENZL's -5.80% return. Over the past 10 years, MNRO has underperformed ENZL with an annualized return of -11.71%, while ENZL has yielded a comparatively higher 3.33% annualized return.


MNRO

1D
3.55%
1M
-25.50%
YTD
-18.96%
6M
-8.26%
1Y
17.91%
3Y*
-27.95%
5Y*
-21.54%
10Y*
-11.71%

ENZL

1D
2.02%
1M
-10.18%
YTD
-5.80%
6M
-5.97%
1Y
3.63%
3Y*
-2.77%
5Y*
-5.18%
10Y*
3.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNRO vs. ENZL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNRO
MNRO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
MNRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNRO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
MNRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNRO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

ENZL
ENZL Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
ENZL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENZL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENZL Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ENZL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENZL Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNRO vs. ENZL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monro, Inc. (MNRO) and iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MNROENZLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.27

0.21

+0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.90

0.41

+0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.05

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

0.29

-0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.58

1.07

-0.49

MNRO vs. ENZL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is higher than the ENZL Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNRO and ENZL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MNROENZLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

0.21

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.48

-0.28

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.28

0.16

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.35

-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between MNRO and ENZL is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MNRO vs. ENZL - Dividend Comparison

MNRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.98%, more than ENZL's 2.37% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MNRO
Monro, Inc.
6.98%5.59%4.52%3.82%2.43%1.68%1.65%1.10%1.13%1.25%1.15%0.88%
ENZL
iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF
2.37%2.23%2.13%3.00%1.62%2.46%1.66%3.35%3.60%3.69%4.79%4.29%

Drawdowns

MNRO vs. ENZL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNRO drawdown since its inception was -84.13%, which is greater than ENZL's maximum drawdown of -42.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNRO and ENZL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MNROENZLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.13%

-42.44%

-41.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.17%

-12.90%

-23.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.66%

-37.18%

-43.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.13%

-42.44%

-41.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.84%

-33.33%

-44.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.94%

-12.58%

-13.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.32%

3.46%

+8.86%

Volatility

MNRO vs. ENZL - Volatility Comparison

Monro, Inc. (MNRO) has a higher volatility of 16.19% compared to iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) at 7.12%. This indicates that MNRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENZL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MNROENZLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.19%

7.12%

+9.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.40%

11.45%

+26.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.25%

17.39%

+48.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.64%

18.45%

+26.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.74%

20.39%

+21.35%