PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNHAX vs. JHQAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNHAX vs. JHQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Fund (JHQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNHAX achieves a 2.27% return, which is significantly higher than JHQAX's -1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, MNHAX has underperformed JHQAX with an annualized return of 6.78%, while JHQAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.95% annualized return.


MNHAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.76%
YTD
2.27%
6M
2.69%
1Y
7.23%
3Y*
9.16%
5Y*
5.52%
10Y*
6.78%

JHQAX

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.20%
YTD
-1.81%
6M
-2.66%
1Y
5.57%
3Y*
8.49%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*
8.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNHAX vs. JHQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNHAX
Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I
2.27%6.90%9.29%13.49%-7.38%10.27%6.58%14.25%-0.98%8.68%
JHQAX
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Fund
-1.81%7.22%17.93%15.78%-8.27%13.13%13.77%13.38%-0.93%12.45%

Correlation

The correlation between MNHAX and JHQAX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2014

0.37

The correlation between MNHAX and JHQAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNHAX vs. JHQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNHAX
MNHAX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
MNHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
MNHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

JHQAX
JHQAX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
JHQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
JHQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNHAX vs. JHQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Fund (JHQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MNHAXJHQAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.19

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

0.85

+1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.59

2.77

+9.83

MNHAX vs. JHQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNHAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the JHQAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNHAX and JHQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNHAX vs. JHQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNHAX drawdown since its inception was -20.13%, which is greater than JHQAX's maximum drawdown of -18.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNHAX and JHQAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNHAXJHQAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.13%

-18.82%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.10%

-6.91%

+3.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

-13.11%

-7.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.13%

-14.48%

-5.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.13%

-18.82%

-1.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.61%

-3.07%

-7.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.54%

-2.22%

-1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

2.12%

-1.53%

Volatility

MNHAX vs. JHQAX - Volatility Comparison

Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX) has a higher volatility of 0.62% compared to JPMorgan Hedged Equity Fund (JHQAX) at 0.52%. This indicates that MNHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNHAXJHQAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

0.52%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.34%

4.54%

-2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86%

6.28%

-3.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.43%

8.86%

+5.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.69%

9.38%

+1.31%

MNHAX vs. JHQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNHAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than JHQAX's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

MNHAX vs. JHQAX - Dividend Comparison

MNHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.35%, more than JHQAX's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHQAX
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Fund
0.37%0.41%0.51%0.74%0.74%0.50%0.89%1.18%0.92%0.76%1.11%0.97%
MNHAX
Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I
6.35%7.29%7.02%8.59%7.61%9.81%6.26%8.24%6.38%6.20%7.68%6.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


MNHAX and JHQAX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MNHAX has higher volatility (0.62%) compared to JHQAX (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNHAX dropped -20.13% vs JHQAX's -18.82%.

MNHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNHAX and JHQAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer