PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMYT vs. CGGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMYT vs. CGGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) and Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMYT achieves a -43.87% return, which is significantly lower than CGGR's 5.01% return.


MMYT

1D
-1.35%
1M
7.81%
YTD
-43.87%
6M
-46.58%
1Y
-49.71%
3Y*
19.44%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
12.44%

CGGR

1D
-0.55%
1M
1.39%
YTD
5.01%
6M
4.06%
1Y
20.91%
3Y*
23.98%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMYT vs. CGGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MMYT
MakeMyTrip Limited
-43.87%-26.86%139.00%70.40%8.89%
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
5.01%19.75%32.12%42.18%-14.68%

Correlation

The correlation between MMYT and CGGR is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022

0.48

The correlation between MMYT and CGGR shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMYT vs. CGGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMYT
MMYT Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MMYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMYT Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
MMYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMYT Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

CGGR
CGGR Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
CGGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGGR Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
CGGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGGR Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMYT vs. CGGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) and Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MMYTCGGRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.22

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

1.39

-2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.36

5.02

-6.38

MMYT vs. CGGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMYT Sharpe Ratio is -1.01, which is lower than the CGGR Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMYT and CGGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MMYT vs. CGGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMYT drawdown since its inception was -73.45%, which is greater than CGGR's maximum drawdown of -28.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMYT and CGGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMYTCGGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.45%

-28.90%

-44.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.83%

-15.13%

-49.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.87%

-23.37%

-46.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.74%

-2.24%

-59.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.42%

-7.67%

-28.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.69%

4.17%

+32.52%

Volatility

MMYT vs. CGGR - Volatility Comparison

MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) has a higher volatility of 16.32% compared to Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) at 7.24%. This indicates that MMYT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMYTCGGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.32%

7.24%

+9.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.44%

13.90%

+28.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.65%

17.43%

+32.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.31%

22.00%

+27.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.49%

22.00%

+31.49%

Dividends

MMYT vs. CGGR - Dividend Comparison

MMYT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
0.09%0.10%0.33%0.40%0.33%
MMYT
MakeMyTrip Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMYT and CGGR have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMYT has higher volatility (16.32%) compared to CGGR (7.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMYT dropped -73.45% vs CGGR's -28.90%.

CGGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMYT and CGGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer