PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MMTRX vs. CGSM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MMTRX and CGSM is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

MMTRX vs. CGSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MassMutual Select T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (MMTRX) and Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (CGSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.52%
1.21%
MMTRX
CGSM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MMTRX:

1.68

CGSM:

1.99

Sortino Ratio

MMTRX:

2.27

CGSM:

2.84

Omega Ratio

MMTRX:

1.31

CGSM:

1.40

Calmar Ratio

MMTRX:

0.52

CGSM:

3.40

Martin Ratio

MMTRX:

8.67

CGSM:

10.09

Ulcer Index

MMTRX:

1.59%

CGSM:

0.39%

Daily Std Dev

MMTRX:

8.22%

CGSM:

1.96%

Max Drawdown

MMTRX:

-32.47%

CGSM:

-1.15%

Current Drawdown

MMTRX:

-16.68%

CGSM:

-0.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMTRX achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly higher than CGSM's 0.12% return.


MMTRX

YTD

1.25%

1M

1.25%

6M

3.19%

1Y

13.23%

5Y*

1.46%

10Y*

N/A

CGSM

YTD

0.12%

1M

-0.04%

6M

1.20%

1Y

4.14%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MMTRX vs. CGSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMTRX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than CGSM's 0.25% expense ratio.


MMTRX
MassMutual Select T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund
Expense ratio chart for MMTRX: current value at 0.37% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.37%
Expense ratio chart for CGSM: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MMTRX vs. CGSM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMTRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MMTRX is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MMTRX is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MMTRX is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MMTRX is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MMTRX is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MMTRX is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

CGSM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CGSM is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CGSM is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CGSM is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CGSM is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CGSM is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CGSM is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MMTRX vs. CGSM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Select T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (MMTRX) and Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (CGSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MMTRX, currently valued at 1.68, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.681.99
The chart of Sortino ratio for MMTRX, currently valued at 2.27, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.272.84
The chart of Omega ratio for MMTRX, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.311.40
The chart of Calmar ratio for MMTRX, currently valued at 2.24, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.243.40
The chart of Martin ratio for MMTRX, currently valued at 8.67, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.008.6710.09
MMTRX
CGSM

The current MMTRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the CGSM Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMTRX and CGSM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00Oct 06Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 03Nov 10Nov 17Nov 24DecemberDec 08Dec 15Dec 22Dec 29Jan 05Jan 12
1.68
1.99
MMTRX
CGSM

Dividends

MMTRX vs. CGSM - Dividend Comparison

MMTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than CGSM's 2.77% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
MMTRX
MassMutual Select T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund
3.63%3.68%2.27%2.98%3.75%1.72%2.14%2.06%
CGSM
Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF
2.77%2.77%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MMTRX vs. CGSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMTRX drawdown since its inception was -32.47%, which is greater than CGSM's maximum drawdown of -1.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMTRX and CGSM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-2.73%
-0.80%
MMTRX
CGSM

Volatility

MMTRX vs. CGSM - Volatility Comparison

MassMutual Select T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (MMTRX) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (CGSM) at 0.69%. This indicates that MMTRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.44%
0.69%
MMTRX
CGSM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab