PortfoliosLab logo
MMTRX vs. CGMU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MMTRX and CGMU is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

MMTRX vs. CGMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MassMutual Select T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (MMTRX) and Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MMTRX:

0.54

CGMU:

0.50

Sortino Ratio

MMTRX:

0.85

CGMU:

0.71

Omega Ratio

MMTRX:

1.12

CGMU:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

MMTRX:

0.26

CGMU:

0.58

Martin Ratio

MMTRX:

2.44

CGMU:

1.85

Ulcer Index

MMTRX:

2.54%

CGMU:

1.13%

Daily Std Dev

MMTRX:

10.97%

CGMU:

4.01%

Max Drawdown

MMTRX:

-32.47%

CGMU:

-4.10%

Current Drawdown

MMTRX:

-16.62%

CGMU:

-1.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMTRX achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly higher than CGMU's -0.08% return.


MMTRX

YTD

1.32%

1M

5.77%

6M

-1.65%

1Y

5.86%

5Y*

3.87%

10Y*

N/A

CGMU

YTD

-0.08%

1M

1.22%

6M

-0.26%

1Y

2.16%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MMTRX vs. CGMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMTRX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than CGMU's 0.27% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MMTRX vs. CGMU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMTRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MMTRX is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MMTRX is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MMTRX is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MMTRX is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MMTRX is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MMTRX is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

CGMU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CGMU is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CGMU is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CGMU is 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CGMU is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CGMU is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CGMU is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MMTRX vs. CGMU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Select T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (MMTRX) and Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MMTRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is comparable to the CGMU Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMTRX and CGMU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

MMTRX vs. CGMU - Dividend Comparison

MMTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than CGMU's 3.27% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
MMTRX
MassMutual Select T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund
3.63%3.68%2.27%2.98%3.75%1.72%2.14%2.06%
CGMU
Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
3.27%3.22%3.09%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MMTRX vs. CGMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMTRX drawdown since its inception was -32.47%, which is greater than CGMU's maximum drawdown of -4.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMTRX and CGMU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MMTRX vs. CGMU - Volatility Comparison

MassMutual Select T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (MMTRX) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) at 1.31%. This indicates that MMTRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...