MMM vs. PEP
Compare and contrast key facts about 3M Company (MMM) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MMM or PEP.
Correlation
The correlation between MMM and PEP is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MMM vs. PEP - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MMM:
2.89
PEP:
-0.49
MMM:
5.62
PEP:
-0.60
MMM:
1.65
PEP:
0.93
MMM:
1.68
PEP:
-0.35
MMM:
24.30
PEP:
-1.06
MMM:
3.80%
PEP:
7.71%
MMM:
31.93%
PEP:
16.58%
MMM:
-59.10%
PEP:
-40.41%
MMM:
-10.25%
PEP:
-19.80%
Fundamentals
MMM:
$80.61B
PEP:
$204.59B
MMM:
$7.26
PEP:
$6.78
MMM:
20.58
PEP:
21.99
MMM:
2.71
PEP:
1.78
MMM:
$26.56B
PEP:
$64.07B
MMM:
$11.24B
PEP:
$35.58B
MMM:
$6.73B
PEP:
$13.35B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMM achieves a 15.76% return, which is significantly higher than PEP's -1.93% return. Over the past 10 years, MMM has underperformed PEP with an annualized return of 4.34%, while PEP has yielded a comparatively higher 7.64% annualized return.
MMM
15.76%
13.91%
18.78%
92.64%
4.50%
4.34%
PEP
-1.93%
-2.18%
-12.28%
-8.31%
3.93%
7.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MMM vs. PEP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MMM
PEP
MMM vs. PEP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3M Company (MMM) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MMM vs. PEP - Dividend Comparison
MMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than PEP's 3.57% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMM 3M Company | 2.25% | 2.60% | 5.49% | 4.97% | 3.33% | 3.36% | 3.26% | 2.86% | 2.00% | 2.49% | 2.72% | 2.08% |
PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 3.57% | 3.51% | 2.91% | 2.50% | 2.45% | 2.71% | 2.77% | 3.25% | 2.64% | 2.83% | 2.76% | 2.68% |
Drawdowns
MMM vs. PEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMM drawdown since its inception was -59.10%, which is greater than PEP's maximum drawdown of -40.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMM and PEP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MMM vs. PEP - Volatility Comparison
3M Company (MMM) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) at 4.87%. This indicates that MMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MMM vs. PEP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between 3M Company and PepsiCo, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities