PortfoliosLab logo
MMM vs. GOOD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MMM and GOOD is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

MMM vs. GOOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 3M Company (MMM) and Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MMM:

1.41

GOOD:

0.11

Sortino Ratio

MMM:

2.67

GOOD:

0.54

Omega Ratio

MMM:

1.36

GOOD:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

MMM:

1.22

GOOD:

0.17

Martin Ratio

MMM:

9.30

GOOD:

0.70

Ulcer Index

MMM:

5.66%

GOOD:

8.27%

Daily Std Dev

MMM:

35.61%

GOOD:

20.88%

Max Drawdown

MMM:

-59.10%

GOOD:

-67.22%

Current Drawdown

MMM:

-13.93%

GOOD:

-27.94%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MMM:

$76.74B

GOOD:

$650.44M

EPS

MMM:

$8.03

GOOD:

$0.27

PE Ratio

MMM:

17.76

GOOD:

52.15

PEG Ratio

MMM:

3.28

GOOD:

-62.67

PS Ratio

MMM:

3.13

GOOD:

4.31

PB Ratio

MMM:

17.01

GOOD:

3.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

MMM:

$24.51B

GOOD:

$113.67M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MMM:

$10.04B

GOOD:

$73.54M

EBITDA (TTM)

MMM:

$6.60B

GOOD:

$85.10M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMM achieves a 11.01% return, which is significantly higher than GOOD's -10.99% return. Over the past 10 years, MMM has underperformed GOOD with an annualized return of 4.00%, while GOOD has yielded a comparatively higher 6.08% annualized return.


MMM

YTD

11.01%

1M

7.24%

6M

7.24%

1Y

47.43%

5Y*

7.39%

10Y*

4.00%

GOOD

YTD

-10.99%

1M

6.62%

6M

-14.94%

1Y

3.18%

5Y*

5.46%

10Y*

6.08%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MMM vs. GOOD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MMM is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MMM is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MMM is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MMM is 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MMM is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MMM is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GOOD is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GOOD is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GOOD is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GOOD is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GOOD is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GOOD is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MMM vs. GOOD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3M Company (MMM) and Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the GOOD Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMM and GOOD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

MMM vs. GOOD - Dividend Comparison

MMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than GOOD's 8.52% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MMM
3M Company
1.98%2.60%5.49%4.97%3.33%3.36%3.26%2.86%2.00%2.49%2.72%2.08%
GOOD
Gladstone Commercial Corporation
8.52%7.39%9.06%8.13%5.83%8.34%6.86%8.37%7.12%7.46%10.28%8.74%

Drawdowns

MMM vs. GOOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMM drawdown since its inception was -59.10%, smaller than the maximum GOOD drawdown of -67.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMM and GOOD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MMM vs. GOOD - Volatility Comparison

3M Company (MMM) has a higher volatility of 11.66% compared to Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) at 5.59%. This indicates that MMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

MMM vs. GOOD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between 3M Company and Gladstone Commercial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20212022202320242025
5.95B
37.38M
(MMM) Total Revenue
(GOOD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MMM vs. GOOD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between 3M Company and Gladstone Commercial Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
41.6%
77.1%
(MMM) Gross Margin
(GOOD) Gross Margin
MMM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, 3M Company reported a gross profit of 2.48B and revenue of 5.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.6%.

GOOD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported a gross profit of 28.80M and revenue of 37.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.1%.

MMM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, 3M Company reported an operating income of 1.25B and revenue of 5.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.9%.

GOOD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported an operating income of 13.34M and revenue of 37.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.7%.

MMM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, 3M Company reported a net income of 1.12B and revenue of 5.95B, resulting in a net margin of 18.7%.

GOOD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported a net income of 7.19M and revenue of 37.38M, resulting in a net margin of 19.2%.