MMM vs. GOOD
Compare and contrast key facts about 3M Company (MMM) and Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MMM or GOOD.
Key characteristics
| MMM | GOOD | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.02% | 5.99% |
| 1Y Return | 21.28% | 26.87% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -11.68% | -6.64% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -4.26% | -1.31% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.12% | 5.73% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.72 | 1.02 |
| Daily Std Dev | 29.27% | 26.59% |
| Max Drawdown | -57.35% | -67.22% |
| Current Drawdown | -40.06% | -35.92% |
Fundamentals
| MMM | GOOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $50.82B | $548.02M |
| EPS | -$12.63 | -$0.19 |
| PE Ratio | 41.67 | 2.76 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.90 | -62.67 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $32.68B | $147.58M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $15.00B | $115.82M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $7.87B | $101.30M |
Correlation
The correlation between MMM and GOOD is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MMM vs. GOOD - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MMM achieves a 8.02% return, which is significantly higher than GOOD's 5.99% return. Over the past 10 years, MMM has underperformed GOOD with an annualized return of 2.12%, while GOOD has yielded a comparatively higher 5.73% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MMM vs. GOOD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3M Company (MMM) and Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MMM vs. GOOD - Dividend Comparison
MMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%, less than GOOD's 8.50% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMM 3M Company | 6.21% | 6.56% | 5.94% | 3.99% | 4.02% | 3.90% | 3.41% | 2.39% | 2.97% | 3.26% | 2.49% | 2.17% |
GOOD Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 8.50% | 8.57% | 8.13% | 5.83% | 8.34% | 6.86% | 8.37% | 7.12% | 7.46% | 10.28% | 8.74% | 8.35% |
Drawdowns
MMM vs. GOOD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMM drawdown since its inception was -57.35%, smaller than the maximum GOOD drawdown of -67.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMM and GOOD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MMM vs. GOOD - Volatility Comparison
3M Company (MMM) has a higher volatility of 6.89% compared to Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) at 6.16%. This indicates that MMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MMM vs. GOOD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between 3M Company and Gladstone Commercial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities