PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MMC vs. TSCO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


MMCTSCO
YTD Return20.88%31.27%
1Y Return15.62%37.26%
3Y Return (Ann)12.26%9.95%
5Y Return (Ann)18.26%25.13%
10Y Return (Ann)17.07%15.69%
Sharpe Ratio0.991.79
Sortino Ratio1.332.40
Omega Ratio1.191.32
Calmar Ratio1.772.21
Martin Ratio5.128.48
Ulcer Index2.82%5.27%
Daily Std Dev14.62%24.96%
Max Drawdown-67.46%-76.15%
Current Drawdown-2.28%-8.23%

Fundamentals


MMCTSCO
Market Cap$110.59B$29.83B
EPS$8.11$10.28
PE Ratio27.7627.16
PEG Ratio2.392.53
Total Revenue (TTM)$23.95B$14.77B
Gross Profit (TTM)$10.31B$5.36B
EBITDA (TTM)$6.95B$1.91B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between MMC and TSCO is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

MMC vs. TSCO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MMC achieves a 20.88% return, which is significantly lower than TSCO's 31.27% return. Over the past 10 years, MMC has outperformed TSCO with an annualized return of 17.07%, while TSCO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.69% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.22%
1.82%
MMC
TSCO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MMC vs. TSCO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) and Tractor Supply Company (TSCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MMC, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.99
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MMC, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.33
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MMC, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.19
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MMC, currently valued at 1.77, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.77
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MMC, currently valued at 5.12, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.005.12
TSCO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TSCO, currently valued at 1.79, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.79
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TSCO, currently valued at 2.40, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.40
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TSCO, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.32
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TSCO, currently valued at 2.21, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.21
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TSCO, currently valued at 8.48, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.008.48

MMC vs. TSCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMC Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the TSCO Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMC and TSCO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.99
1.79
MMC
TSCO

Dividends

MMC vs. TSCO - Dividend Comparison

MMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than TSCO's 1.55% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MMC
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
1.35%1.37%1.36%1.15%1.57%1.56%1.98%1.76%1.92%2.13%1.85%1.99%
TSCO
Tractor Supply Company
1.55%1.92%1.64%0.87%1.07%1.46%1.44%1.40%1.21%0.89%0.77%0.63%

Drawdowns

MMC vs. TSCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMC drawdown since its inception was -67.46%, smaller than the maximum TSCO drawdown of -76.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMC and TSCO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.28%
-8.23%
MMC
TSCO

Volatility

MMC vs. TSCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) is 3.16%, while Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) has a volatility of 9.06%. This indicates that MMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.16%
9.06%
MMC
TSCO

Financials

MMC vs. TSCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. and Tractor Supply Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items