PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MMC vs. TMUS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


MMCTMUS
YTD Return6.00%2.80%
1Y Return11.47%15.60%
3Y Return (Ann)15.36%7.83%
5Y Return (Ann)18.31%17.69%
10Y Return (Ann)17.30%17.92%
Sharpe Ratio0.840.94
Daily Std Dev14.60%15.97%
Max Drawdown-67.46%-86.29%
Current Drawdown-3.74%-1.94%

Fundamentals


MMCTMUS
Market Cap$97.53B$194.60B
EPS$7.88$7.35
PE Ratio25.1222.31
PEG Ratio2.430.81
Revenue (TTM)$23.29B$78.52B
Gross Profit (TTM)$8.88B$47.56B
EBITDA (TTM)$6.82B$29.11B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between MMC and TMUS is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

MMC vs. TMUS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MMC achieves a 6.00% return, which is significantly higher than TMUS's 2.80% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MMC having a 17.30% annualized return and TMUS not far ahead at 17.92%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%800.00%900.00%December2024FebruaryMarchApril
829.44%
265.07%
MMC
TMUS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.

T-Mobile US, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MMC vs. TMUS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) and T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MMC, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.000.84
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MMC, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.16
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MMC, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.16
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MMC, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.51
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MMC, currently valued at 4.36, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.004.36
TMUS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TMUS, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.000.94
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TMUS, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.33
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TMUS, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.18
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TMUS, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.89
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TMUS, currently valued at 3.84, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.003.84

MMC vs. TMUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMC Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which roughly equals the TMUS Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of MMC and TMUS.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00December2024FebruaryMarchApril
0.84
0.94
MMC
TMUS

Dividends

MMC vs. TMUS - Dividend Comparison

MMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than TMUS's 0.79% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MMC
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
1.42%1.37%1.36%1.15%1.57%1.56%1.98%1.76%1.92%2.13%1.85%1.99%
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
0.79%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%12.04%

Drawdowns

MMC vs. TMUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMC drawdown since its inception was -67.46%, smaller than the maximum TMUS drawdown of -86.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMC and TMUS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchApril
-3.74%
-1.94%
MMC
TMUS

Volatility

MMC vs. TMUS - Volatility Comparison

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) at 2.02%. This indicates that MMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%December2024FebruaryMarchApril
4.70%
2.02%
MMC
TMUS

Financials

MMC vs. TMUS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. and T-Mobile US, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items