MMC vs. PANW
Compare and contrast key facts about Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MMC or PANW.
Key characteristics
| MMC | PANW | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 19.84% | 35.00% |
| 1Y Return | 13.28% | 57.04% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 11.97% | 32.55% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 18.17% | 37.61% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 16.98% | 26.93% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.01 | 1.45 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.35 | 1.73 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.19 | 1.32 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.81 | 2.10 |
| Martin Ratio | 5.23 | 4.41 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.82% | 14.53% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.64% | 44.02% |
| Max Drawdown | -67.46% | -47.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.12% | 0.00% |
Fundamentals
| MMC | PANW | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $109.91B | $130.28B |
| EPS | $8.10 | $7.28 |
| PE Ratio | 27.63 | 54.68 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.39 | 2.84 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $23.95B | $6.15B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $10.31B | $4.56B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $6.95B | $866.40M |
Correlation
The correlation between MMC and PANW is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MMC vs. PANW - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MMC achieves a 19.84% return, which is significantly lower than PANW's 35.00% return. Over the past 10 years, MMC has underperformed PANW with an annualized return of 16.98%, while PANW has yielded a comparatively higher 26.93% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MMC vs. PANW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MMC vs. PANW - Dividend Comparison
MMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, while PANW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMC Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. | 1.36% | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.15% | 1.57% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.92% | 2.13% | 1.85% | 1.99% |
PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MMC vs. PANW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMC drawdown since its inception was -67.46%, which is greater than PANW's maximum drawdown of -47.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMC and PANW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MMC vs. PANW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) is 3.35%, while Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that MMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PANW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MMC vs. PANW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities