MMC vs. PANW
Compare and contrast key facts about Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MMC or PANW.
Correlation
The correlation between MMC and PANW is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
MMC vs. PANW - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
MMC:
0.70
PANW:
0.83
MMC:
1.06
PANW:
1.28
MMC:
1.15
PANW:
1.16
MMC:
1.00
PANW:
1.03
MMC:
2.92
PANW:
3.12
MMC:
4.49%
PANW:
8.87%
MMC:
17.46%
PANW:
36.39%
MMC:
-67.46%
PANW:
-47.98%
MMC:
-7.06%
PANW:
-7.10%
Fundamentals
MMC:
$111.78B
PANW:
$123.77B
MMC:
$8.16
PANW:
$1.77
MMC:
27.80
PANW:
105.61
MMC:
2.45
PANW:
2.31
MMC:
4.46
PANW:
14.44
MMC:
7.95
PANW:
19.54
MMC:
$25.05B
PANW:
$6.59B
MMC:
$10.67B
PANW:
$4.86B
MMC:
$7.08B
PANW:
$1.26B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMC achieves a 7.64% return, which is significantly higher than PANW's 6.34% return. Over the past 10 years, MMC has underperformed PANW with an annualized return of 16.69%, while PANW has yielded a comparatively higher 22.41% annualized return.
MMC
7.64%
-2.70%
2.17%
12.06%
18.45%
16.69%
PANW
6.34%
14.95%
-2.79%
30.10%
40.20%
22.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MMC vs. PANW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MMC
PANW
MMC vs. PANW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
MMC vs. PANW - Dividend Comparison
MMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, while PANW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMC Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. | 1.44% | 1.44% | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.15% | 1.57% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.92% | 2.13% | 1.85% |
PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MMC vs. PANW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMC drawdown since its inception was -67.46%, which is greater than PANW's maximum drawdown of -47.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMC and PANW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
MMC vs. PANW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) is 8.48%, while Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) has a volatility of 9.35%. This indicates that MMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PANW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
MMC vs. PANW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MMC vs. PANW - Profitability Comparison
MMC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.21B and revenue of 7.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.5%.
PANW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.66B and revenue of 2.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.5%.
MMC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.01B and revenue of 7.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.
PANW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 240.40M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.
MMC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 1.38B and revenue of 7.06B, resulting in a net margin of 19.6%.
PANW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 267.30M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.