MLR vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Miller Industries, Inc. (MLR) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MLR or SCHG.
Correlation
The correlation between MLR and SCHG is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
MLR vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MLR:
1.83
SCHG:
2.05
MLR:
2.58
SCHG:
2.68
MLR:
1.33
SCHG:
1.37
MLR:
1.27
SCHG:
2.91
MLR:
8.91
SCHG:
11.49
MLR:
7.20%
SCHG:
3.13%
MLR:
34.95%
SCHG:
17.49%
MLR:
-98.13%
SCHG:
-34.59%
MLR:
-12.84%
SCHG:
-3.88%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLR achieves a 60.91% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 35.44% return. Over the past 10 years, MLR has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 15.79%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.66% annualized return.
MLR
60.91%
-0.92%
16.63%
62.22%
15.03%
15.79%
SCHG
35.44%
3.33%
10.58%
35.25%
19.99%
16.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MLR vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Miller Industries, Inc. (MLR) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MLR vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
MLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than SCHG's 0.42% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLR Miller Industries, Inc. | 1.13% | 1.70% | 2.70% | 2.16% | 1.89% | 1.94% | 3.33% | 2.79% | 2.57% | 2.94% | 2.89% | 3.01% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.42% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
MLR vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLR drawdown since its inception was -98.13%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLR and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MLR vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Miller Industries, Inc. (MLR) has a higher volatility of 9.45% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.97%. This indicates that MLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.