MLR vs. NGS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Miller Industries, Inc. (MLR) and Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. (NGS).

Performance

MLR vs. NGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Miller Industries, Inc. (MLR) and Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. (NGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MLR vs. NGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MLR Miller Industries, Inc.	22.48%	-41.73%	56.58%	61.77%	-17.93%	-10.51%	4.82%	40.68%	7.49%	0.32%
NGS Natural Gas Services Group, Inc.	12.49%	26.53%	66.67%	40.31%	9.46%	10.44%	-22.68%	-25.43%	-37.25%	-18.51%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MLR : $527.10M NGS : $479.11M
EPS MLR : $1.99 NGS : $1.57
PE Ratio MLR : 22.94 NGS : 23.99
PEG Ratio MLR : 0.58 NGS : 0.12
PS Ratio MLR : 0.67 NGS : 2.77
PB Ratio MLR : 1.25 NGS : 1.74
Total Revenue (TTM) MLR : $789.52M NGS : $172.32M
Gross Profit (TTM) MLR : $120.39M NGS : $100.54M
EBITDA (TTM) MLR : $43.30M NGS : $65.79M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLR achieves a 22.48% return, which is significantly higher than NGS's 12.49% return. Over the past 10 years, MLR has outperformed NGS with an annualized return of 10.67%, while NGS has yielded a comparatively lower 6.14% annualized return.

MLR

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 8.90%
• YTD: 22.48%
• 6M: 13.84%
• 1Y: 9.60%
• 3Y*: 10.70%
• 5Y*: 1.42%
• 10Y*: 10.67%

NGS

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: -1.36%
• YTD: 12.49%
• 6M: 35.71%
• 1Y: 73.62%
• 3Y*: 54.67%
• 5Y*: 32.19%
• 10Y*: 6.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MLR vs. NGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLR

MLR Risk / Return Rank: 49
MLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
MLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
MLR Omega Ratio Rank: 45
MLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
MLR Martin Ratio Rank: 51

NGS

NGS Risk / Return Rank: 86
NGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
NGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
NGS Omega Ratio Rank: 85
NGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
NGS Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLR vs. NGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Miller Industries, Inc. (MLR) and Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. (NGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MLR	NGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.31	1.72	-1.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.65	2.25	-1.60
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.33	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.40	3.26	-2.86
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.81	10.41	-9.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MLR vs. NGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the NGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLR and NGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLR	NGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31	1.72	-1.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05	0.73	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.13	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.19	-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between MLR and NGS is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MLR vs. NGS - Dividend Comparison

MLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than NGS's 0.85% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MLR Miller Industries, Inc.	1.78%	2.14%	1.16%	1.70%	2.70%	2.16%	1.89%	1.94%	2.67%	2.79%	2.57%	2.94%
NGS Natural Gas Services Group, Inc.	0.85%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MLR vs. NGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLR drawdown since its inception was -98.14%, which is greater than NGS's maximum drawdown of -89.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLR and NGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLR	NGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.14%	-89.59%	-8.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.66%	-23.09%	-0.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.25%	-40.89%	-12.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.25%	-87.91%	+34.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.92%	-5.22%	-34.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.81%	-47.82%	-21.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.72%	7.24%	+4.48%

Volatility

MLR vs. NGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Miller Industries, Inc. (MLR) is 9.88%, while Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. (NGS) has a volatility of 11.01%. This indicates that MLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLR	NGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.88%	11.01%	-1.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.54%	23.26%	-3.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.32%	43.04%	-11.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.49%	44.07%	-13.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.86%	46.38%	-15.52%

Financials

MLR vs. NGS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Miller Industries, Inc. and Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MLR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Miller Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 26.53M and revenue of 171.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.5%.

NGS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.20M and revenue of 46.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.3%.

MLR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Miller Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.46M and revenue of 171.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.

NGS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.11M and revenue of 46.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.

MLR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Miller Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 3.41M and revenue of 171.17M, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.

NGS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. reported a net income of 4.10M and revenue of 46.15M, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.