MLR vs. CAT
MLR (Miller Industries, Inc.) and CAT (Caterpillar Inc.) are both stocks. MLR operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while CAT operates in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, MLR returned 11.55%/yr vs 33.19%/yr for CAT. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MLR vs. CAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLR achieves a 34.30% return, which is significantly lower than CAT's 79.21% return. Over the past 10 years, MLR has underperformed CAT with an annualized return of 11.55%, while CAT has yielded a comparatively higher 33.19% annualized return.
MLR
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 7.28%
- YTD
- 34.30%
- 6M
- 32.08%
- 1Y
- 15.99%
- 3Y*
- 14.24%
- 5Y*
- 7.08%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
CAT
- 1D
- 3.70%
- 1M
- 16.18%
- YTD
- 79.21%
- 6M
- 76.27%
- 1Y
- 186.63%
- 3Y*
- 65.85%
- 5Y*
- 39.22%
- 10Y*
- 33.19%
MLR vs. CAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLR Miller Industries, Inc. | 34.30% | -41.73% | 56.58% | 61.77% | -17.93% | -10.51% | 4.82% | 40.68% | 7.49% | 0.32% |
CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 79.21% | 60.30% | 24.66% | 25.95% | 18.60% | 15.95% | 26.97% | 19.51% | -17.56% | 75.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLR and CAT is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 1994 | 0.28 |
Over the past year, MLR and CAT have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
MLR:
$573.29M
CAT:
$476.18B
MLR:
$1.34
CAT:
$20.07
MLR:
37.12
CAT:
50.93
MLR:
0.95
CAT:
3.37
MLR:
0.77
CAT:
6.78
MLR:
1.37
CAT:
25.52
MLR:
$744.73M
CAT:
$70.76B
MLR:
$112.13M
CAT:
$23.01B
MLR:
$33.28M
CAT:
$15.31B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLR vs. CAT — Risk / Return Rank
MLR
CAT
MLR vs. CAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Miller Industries, Inc. (MLR) and Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MLR | CAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.73 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 13.53 | -12.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.48 | 44.33 | -42.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MLR vs. CAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLR drawdown since its inception was -98.14%, which is greater than CAT's maximum drawdown of -73.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLR and CAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLR | CAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.14% | -73.43% | -24.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.80% | -13.88% | -8.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.70% | -34.05% | -18.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.70% | -34.05% | -18.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.25% | -43.36% | -9.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.12% | 0.00% | -34.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.58% | -19.72% | -49.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.84% | 4.23% | +6.61% |
Volatility
MLR vs. CAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Miller Industries, Inc. (MLR) is 7.51%, while Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) has a volatility of 12.90%. This indicates that MLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLR | CAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.51% | 12.90% | -5.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.02% | 27.80% | -8.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.13% | 35.49% | -6.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.58% | 30.84% | -0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.98% | 31.03% | -0.05% |
Dividends
MLR vs. CAT - Dividend Comparison
MLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than CAT's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 0.59% | 1.02% | 1.49% | 1.69% | 1.93% | 2.07% | 2.26% | 2.56% | 2.58% | 1.97% | 3.32% | 4.33% |
MLR Miller Industries, Inc. | 1.65% | 2.14% | 1.16% | 1.70% | 2.70% | 2.16% | 1.89% | 1.94% | 2.67% | 2.79% | 2.57% | 2.94% |
Financials
MLR vs. CAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Miller Industries, Inc. and Caterpillar Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MLR vs. CAT - Profitability Comparison
MLR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Miller Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 25.68M and revenue of 180.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.2%.
CAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.11B and revenue of 17.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.1%.
MLR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Miller Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.73M and revenue of 180.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.
CAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported an operating income of 3.09B and revenue of 17.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.
MLR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Miller Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 555.00K and revenue of 180.86M, resulting in a net margin of 0.3%.
CAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 17.42B, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MLR and CAT have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAT has higher volatility (12.90%) compared to MLR (7.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLR dropped -98.14% vs CAT's -73.43%.
CAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.30 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLR and CAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer