PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLR vs. BUD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MLR vs. BUD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Miller Industries, Inc. (MLR) and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLR achieves a 34.30% return, which is significantly higher than BUD's 28.09% return. Over the past 10 years, MLR has outperformed BUD with an annualized return of 11.55%, while BUD has yielded a comparatively lower -1.97% annualized return.


MLR

1D
-0.08%
1M
7.28%
YTD
34.30%
6M
32.08%
1Y
15.99%
3Y*
14.24%
5Y*
7.08%
10Y*
11.55%

BUD

1D
0.11%
1M
-3.14%
YTD
28.09%
6M
29.40%
1Y
15.55%
3Y*
14.09%
5Y*
2.93%
10Y*
-1.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLR vs. BUD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLR
Miller Industries, Inc.
34.30%-41.73%56.58%61.77%-17.93%-10.51%4.82%40.68%7.49%0.32%
BUD
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
28.09%30.33%-21.37%9.04%0.09%-12.66%-13.97%27.69%-38.79%9.62%

Correlation

The correlation between MLR and BUD is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2009

0.29

The correlation between MLR and BUD shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MLR:

$573.29M

BUD:

$159.86B

EPS

MLR:

$1.34

BUD:

$6.15

PE Ratio

MLR:

37.12

BUD:

13.14

PEG Ratio

MLR:

0.95

BUD:

1.16

PS Ratio

MLR:

0.77

BUD:

1.33

PB Ratio

MLR:

1.37

BUD:

1.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

MLR:

$744.73M

BUD:

$120.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MLR:

$112.13M

BUD:

$67.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

MLR:

$33.28M

BUD:

$35.48B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLR vs. BUD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLR
MLR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
MLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
MLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLR Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

BUD
BUD Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
BUD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUD Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BUD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUD Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLR vs. BUD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Miller Industries, Inc. (MLR) and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLRBUDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.14

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

0.78

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.48

1.46

+0.02

MLR vs. BUD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is comparable to the BUD Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLR and BUD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLR vs. BUD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLR drawdown since its inception was -98.14%, which is greater than BUD's maximum drawdown of -70.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLR and BUD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLRBUDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.14%

-70.02%

-28.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.80%

-20.12%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.70%

-31.55%

-21.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.70%

-39.93%

-12.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.25%

-70.02%

+16.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.12%

-24.74%

-9.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.58%

-23.45%

-46.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.84%

10.70%

+0.14%

Volatility

MLR vs. BUD - Volatility Comparison

Miller Industries, Inc. (MLR) has a higher volatility of 7.51% compared to Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) at 6.75%. This indicates that MLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLRBUDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.51%

6.75%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.02%

18.03%

+0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.13%

26.55%

+2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.58%

24.89%

+5.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.98%

27.65%

+3.33%

Dividends

MLR vs. BUD - Dividend Comparison

MLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, which matches BUD's 1.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUD
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
1.66%1.91%1.74%1.28%0.88%0.98%0.79%2.45%5.15%3.63%5.41%3.21%
MLR
Miller Industries, Inc.
1.65%2.14%1.16%1.70%2.70%2.16%1.89%1.94%2.67%2.79%2.57%2.94%

Financials

MLR vs. BUD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Miller Industries, Inc. and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
180.86M
30.61B
(MLR) Total Revenue
(BUD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MLR vs. BUD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Miller Industries, Inc. and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
14.2%
55.9%
Portfolio components
MLR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Miller Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 25.68M and revenue of 180.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.2%.

BUD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported a gross profit of 17.10B and revenue of 30.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.9%.

MLR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Miller Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.73M and revenue of 180.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.

BUD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported an operating income of 80.56M and revenue of 30.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.

MLR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Miller Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 555.00K and revenue of 180.86M, resulting in a net margin of 0.3%.

BUD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported a net income of 3.01B and revenue of 30.61B, resulting in a net margin of 9.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MLR and BUD have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLR has higher volatility (7.51%) compared to BUD (6.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLR dropped -98.14% vs BUD's -70.02%.

BUD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLR and BUD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer