MLPX vs. FXZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MLPX (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) and FXZ (First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPX is a MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index, while FXZ is a Materials fund tracking the StrataQuant Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MLPX returned 12.41%/yr vs 11.67%/yr for FXZ. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MLPX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FXZ.

Performance

MLPX vs. FXZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPX achieves a 23.59% return, which is significantly lower than FXZ's 29.62% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPX has outperformed FXZ with an annualized return of 12.41%, while FXZ has yielded a comparatively lower 11.67% annualized return.

MLPX

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: -2.15%
• YTD: 23.59%
• 6M: 23.51%
• 1Y: 22.94%
• 3Y*: 28.13%
• 5Y*: 20.92%
• 10Y*: 12.41%

FXZ

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 5.70%
• YTD: 29.62%
• 6M: 33.34%
• 1Y: 53.31%
• 3Y*: 13.07%
• 5Y*: 7.84%
• 10Y*: 11.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPX vs. FXZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF	23.59%	4.96%	42.90%	15.77%	21.54%	39.63%	-20.32%	19.04%	-15.64%	-4.53%
FXZ First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund	29.62%	16.25%	-16.31%	16.27%	-0.92%	30.84%	22.52%	21.52%	-22.62%	23.72%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPX and FXZ is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2013	0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between MLPX and FXZ has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MLPX vs. FXZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MLPX	FXZ
Energy	99.5%	-
Utilities	0.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	75.7%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	3.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	20.4%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

MLPX vs. FXZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPX

MLPX Risk / Return Rank: 44
MLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
MLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
MLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
MLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
MLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

FXZ

FXZ Risk / Return Rank: 74
FXZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FXZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FXZ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FXZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FXZ Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPX vs. FXZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MLPX	FXZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	2.45	-0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	3.21	-1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.40	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	4.20	-1.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.27	15.80	-8.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MLPX vs. FXZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the FXZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPX and FXZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLPX	FXZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50	2.45	-0.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.05	0.33	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.47	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.35	0.00

Drawdowns

MLPX vs. FXZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPX drawdown since its inception was -70.67%, which is greater than FXZ's maximum drawdown of -65.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPX and FXZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPX	FXZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.67%	-65.46%	-5.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.18%	-12.75%	+4.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.77%	-33.99%	+17.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.72%	-33.99%	+14.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.70%	-49.41%	-15.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.68%	-0.40%	-5.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.63%	-11.36%	-5.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	3.38%	-0.21%

Volatility

MLPX vs. FXZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) is 6.41%, while First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) has a volatility of 7.04%. This indicates that MLPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLPX	FXZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.41%	7.04%	-0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.84%	16.40%	-4.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.38%	21.87%	-6.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.08%	24.13%	-4.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.50%	24.87%	+1.63%

MLPX vs. FXZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FXZ's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPX vs. FXZ - Dividend Comparison

MLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than FXZ's 1.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FXZ First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund	1.38%	1.74%	1.81%	1.97%	1.56%	1.11%	1.51%	1.58%	1.38%	1.01%	1.19%	1.26%
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF	4.15%	4.88%	4.30%	5.22%	5.23%	5.98%	8.32%	5.78%	5.77%	4.36%	5.50%	4.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPX and FXZ in my portfolio?

MLPX and FXZ have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MLPX or FXZ?

FXZ has higher volatility (7.04%) compared to MLPX (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPX dropped -70.67% vs FXZ's -65.46%.

Which ETF is better, MLPX or FXZ?

On 10-year performance, MLPX leads with 12.41% vs 11.67% for FXZ. On fees, MLPX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, MLPX has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MLPX or FXZ?

Over the 10-year period, MLPX has performed better with a 12.41% return vs 11.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MLPX or FXZ?

MLPX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for FXZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MLPX or FXZ?

MLPX has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 1.38% for FXZ.

What is the main difference between MLPX and FXZ?

MLPX is categorized as MLPs, while FXZ is Materials. MLPX tracks Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index, while FXZ tracks StrataQuant Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MLPX and 0.67% for FXZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FXZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.