MLPR vs. SCHD
MLPR (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPR is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Alerian MLP Index (150%), while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MLPR returned 26.89%/yr vs 8.36%/yr for SCHD. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MLPR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
MLPR vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPR achieves a 29.81% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 19.01% return.
MLPR
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- YTD
- 29.81%
- 6M
- 26.95%
- 1Y
- 32.42%
- 3Y*
- 32.14%
- 5Y*
- 26.89%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 18.63%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
MLPR vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN | 29.81% | 9.83% | 31.57% | 35.87% | 41.04% | 57.33% | -9.51% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.01% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 21.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPR and SCHD is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.55 |
The correlation between MLPR and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPR vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
MLPR
SCHD
MLPR vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPR | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.45 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 5.91 | -3.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.53 | 14.53 | -7.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPR | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 2.49 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 0.58 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.86 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
MLPR vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPR drawdown since its inception was -48.98%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPR and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPR | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.98% | -33.37% | -15.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.97% | -4.61% | -9.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.45% | -16.13% | -8.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.66% | -16.85% | -11.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.07% | -1.40% | -5.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.94% | -3.32% | -5.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 1.88% | +2.44% |
Volatility
MLPR vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) has a higher volatility of 8.12% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.66%. This indicates that MLPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPR | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.12% | 2.66% | +5.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.85% | 7.66% | +7.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.64% | 10.96% | +9.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.52% | 14.38% | +15.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.75% | 16.72% | +17.03% |
MLPR vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPR vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
MLPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.00%, more than SCHD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN | 9.00% | 10.85% | 9.57% | 10.08% | 7.49% | 10.69% | 4.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPR and SCHD have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLPR has higher volatility (8.12%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPR dropped -48.98% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 5-year performance, MLPR leads with 26.89% vs 8.36% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MLPR has performed better with a 26.89% return vs 8.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MLPR.
MLPR has the higher dividend yield at 9.00%, compared with 3.26% for SCHD.
MLPR is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. MLPR tracks Alerian MLP Index (150%), while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MLPR and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLPR and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer