PortfoliosLab logo
MLPA vs. XYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MLPA and XYLD is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

MLPA vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MLPA:

0.82

XYLD:

0.59

Sortino Ratio

MLPA:

1.12

XYLD:

0.88

Omega Ratio

MLPA:

1.15

XYLD:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

MLPA:

0.97

XYLD:

0.53

Martin Ratio

MLPA:

3.29

XYLD:

2.01

Ulcer Index

MLPA:

4.17%

XYLD:

4.10%

Daily Std Dev

MLPA:

17.93%

XYLD:

15.37%

Max Drawdown

MLPA:

-78.75%

XYLD:

-33.46%

Current Drawdown

MLPA:

-7.52%

XYLD:

-7.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPA achieves a 3.17% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD's -4.27% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPA has underperformed XYLD with an annualized return of 2.25%, while XYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 6.42% annualized return.


MLPA

YTD

3.17%

1M

1.72%

6M

-3.11%

1Y

14.58%

3Y*

13.33%

5Y*

20.53%

10Y*

2.25%

XYLD

YTD

-4.27%

1M

0.91%

6M

-2.11%

1Y

9.04%

3Y*

6.52%

5Y*

9.28%

10Y*

6.42%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Global X MLP ETF

Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF

MLPA vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPA has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MLPA vs. XYLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MLPA is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MLPA is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MLPA is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MLPA is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MLPA is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MLPA is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XYLD is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XYLD is 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XYLD is 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XYLD is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XYLD is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XYLD is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MLPA vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MLPA Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPA and XYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

MLPA vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

MLPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, less than XYLD's 13.34% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MLPA
Global X MLP ETF
7.49%7.25%7.49%7.30%8.72%13.84%9.09%10.00%8.05%7.15%9.29%5.80%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
13.34%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.75%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%4.15%

Drawdowns

MLPA vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPA drawdown since its inception was -78.75%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPA and XYLD.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

MLPA vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 1.90%. This indicates that MLPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...