PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPA vs. XYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MLPA vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MLPA vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPA
Global X MLP ETF
13.45%5.73%20.35%15.93%27.03%39.64%-33.97%11.91%-15.71%-8.31%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
-1.04%8.02%19.49%11.10%-12.05%19.59%-0.56%21.41%-6.09%16.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPA achieves a 13.45% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD's -1.04% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MLPA having a 8.14% annualized return and XYLD not far behind at 7.87%.


MLPA

1D
-1.37%
1M
0.67%
YTD
13.45%
6M
15.77%
1Y
9.41%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
18.64%
10Y*
8.14%

XYLD

1D
2.01%
1M
-2.96%
YTD
-1.04%
6M
5.33%
1Y
10.53%
3Y*
10.21%
5Y*
6.95%
10Y*
7.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MLPA vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPA has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MLPA vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPA
MLPA Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MLPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPA Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPA Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPA vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPAXYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.59

0.76

-0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.86

1.22

-0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.25

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

1.10

-0.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.56

6.46

-4.90

MLPA vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPA Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is comparable to the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPA and XYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPAXYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

0.76

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.62

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.55

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.57

-0.41

Correlation

The correlation between MLPA and XYLD is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MLPA vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

MLPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.15%, less than XYLD's 10.98% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPA
Global X MLP ETF
7.15%7.82%7.25%7.49%7.30%8.72%13.84%9.09%10.00%8.05%7.15%9.29%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.98%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Drawdowns

MLPA vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPA drawdown since its inception was -78.75%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPA and XYLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPAXYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.75%

-33.46%

-45.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.20%

-10.14%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.75%

-18.66%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.05%

-33.46%

-40.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.87%

-3.39%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.50%

-3.76%

-16.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.73%

1.72%

+4.01%

Volatility

MLPA vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) is 3.34%, while Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) has a volatility of 4.01%. This indicates that MLPA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MLPAXYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

4.01%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

5.82%

+2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.09%

13.99%

+2.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.41%

11.31%

+7.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.64%

14.23%

+13.41%