MLPA vs. XYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD).
MLPA and XYLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MLPA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Apr 18, 2012. XYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE S&P 500 2% OTM BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2013. Both MLPA and XYLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MLPA or XYLD.
Correlation
The correlation between MLPA and XYLD is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MLPA vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MLPA:
1.50
XYLD:
2.88
MLPA:
2.16
XYLD:
3.99
MLPA:
1.26
XYLD:
1.77
MLPA:
2.12
XYLD:
3.94
MLPA:
8.07
XYLD:
25.87
MLPA:
2.38%
XYLD:
0.79%
MLPA:
12.82%
XYLD:
7.09%
MLPA:
-78.74%
XYLD:
-33.46%
MLPA:
-7.17%
XYLD:
0.00%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MLPA having a 18.96% return and XYLD slightly higher at 19.26%. Over the past 10 years, MLPA has underperformed XYLD with an annualized return of 1.65%, while XYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 7.07% annualized return.
MLPA
18.96%
-1.57%
6.67%
18.58%
10.23%
1.65%
XYLD
19.26%
2.75%
11.45%
19.65%
6.78%
7.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLPA vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPA has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MLPA vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MLPA vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison
MLPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.33%, less than XYLD's 9.16% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 7.33% | 7.49% | 7.30% | 8.72% | 13.85% | 9.11% | 10.03% | 8.07% | 7.16% | 9.29% | 5.80% | 5.62% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 9.16% | 10.51% | 13.44% | 9.08% | 7.93% | 5.75% | 7.12% | 4.67% | 3.24% | 4.65% | 4.15% | 2.49% |
Drawdowns
MLPA vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPA drawdown since its inception was -78.74%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPA and XYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MLPA vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison
Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 1.98%. This indicates that MLPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.