MLN vs. FALN
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Long Muni ETF (MLN) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN).
MLN and FALN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MLN is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg AMT-Free Long Continuous. It was launched on Jan 2, 2008. FALN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US High Yield Fallen Angel 3% Capped Index. It was launched on Jun 14, 2016. Both MLN and FALN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MLN or FALN.
Correlation
The correlation between MLN and FALN is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MLN vs. FALN - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MLN:
0.21
FALN:
1.47
MLN:
0.32
FALN:
2.07
MLN:
1.04
FALN:
1.26
MLN:
0.09
FALN:
1.83
MLN:
0.96
FALN:
9.36
MLN:
1.32%
FALN:
0.74%
MLN:
6.00%
FALN:
4.68%
MLN:
-28.36%
FALN:
-29.22%
MLN:
-10.65%
FALN:
-1.74%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLN achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly lower than FALN's 7.37% return.
MLN
0.78%
-0.88%
0.78%
1.26%
-0.48%
1.99%
FALN
7.37%
-0.44%
4.53%
7.17%
5.00%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLN vs. FALN - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLN has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than FALN's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MLN vs. FALN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Long Muni ETF (MLN) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MLN vs. FALN - Dividend Comparison
MLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than FALN's 6.25% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLN VanEck Long Muni ETF | 3.60% | 3.19% | 2.67% | 2.52% | 2.69% | 2.87% | 3.09% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 3.39% | 3.78% | 4.43% |
FALN iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF | 6.25% | 5.38% | 5.08% | 3.39% | 5.14% | 5.35% | 5.97% | 6.99% | 3.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MLN vs. FALN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLN drawdown since its inception was -28.36%, roughly equal to the maximum FALN drawdown of -29.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLN and FALN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MLN vs. FALN - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Long Muni ETF (MLN) has a higher volatility of 2.17% compared to iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) at 1.70%. This indicates that MLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.