PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLM vs. VMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MLM vs. VMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM) and Vulcan Materials Company (VMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLM achieves a -1.79% return, which is significantly lower than VMC's 7.14% return. Over the past 10 years, MLM has outperformed VMC with an annualized return of 13.33%, while VMC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.83% annualized return.


MLM

1D
0.12%
1M
13.84%
YTD
-1.79%
6M
-3.32%
1Y
13.92%
3Y*
11.93%
5Y*
12.44%
10Y*
13.33%

VMC

1D
0.51%
1M
16.78%
YTD
7.14%
6M
4.69%
1Y
19.79%
3Y*
13.23%
5Y*
13.21%
10Y*
10.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLM vs. VMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLM
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
-1.79%21.25%4.08%48.62%-22.73%56.11%2.57%64.18%-21.55%0.57%
VMC
Vulcan Materials Company
7.14%11.70%14.12%30.75%-14.87%41.09%4.15%47.13%-22.28%3.42%

Correlation

The correlation between MLM and VMC is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 1994

0.68

Over the past year, MLM and VMC have become more correlated (0.90) than their long-term average of 0.68, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

MLM:

$18.20

VMC:

$11.24

PE Ratio

MLM:

33.50

VMC:

27.08

PEG Ratio

MLM:

1.50

VMC:

1.68

PS Ratio

MLM:

5.62

VMC:

3.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

MLM:

$6.55B

VMC:

$8.05B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MLM:

$1.94B

VMC:

$2.22B

EBITDA (TTM)

MLM:

$1.96B

VMC:

$2.59B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLM vs. VMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLM
MLM Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLM Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
MLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLM Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VMC
VMC Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMC Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLM vs. VMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM) and Vulcan Materials Company (VMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLMVMCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.15

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

0.90

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.43

2.18

-0.75

MLM vs. VMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLM Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is comparable to the VMC Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLM and VMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLM vs. VMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLM drawdown since its inception was -63.73%, smaller than the maximum VMC drawdown of -76.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLM and VMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLMVMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.73%

-76.02%

+12.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.69%

-22.05%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.78%

-24.43%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.75%

-32.50%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.34%

-49.23%

+0.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.64%

-7.51%

-6.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.66%

-18.72%

-2.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.75%

9.11%

+0.64%

Volatility

MLM vs. VMC - Volatility Comparison

Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM) has a higher volatility of 10.08% compared to Vulcan Materials Company (VMC) at 9.32%. This indicates that MLM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLMVMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.08%

9.32%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.64%

22.05%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.85%

26.10%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.71%

26.21%

+0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.84%

30.42%

+0.42%

Dividends

MLM vs. VMC - Dividend Comparison

MLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than VMC's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLM
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
0.54%0.52%0.59%0.56%0.75%0.54%0.79%0.74%1.07%0.78%0.74%1.17%
VMC
Vulcan Materials Company
0.66%0.69%0.72%0.76%0.91%0.71%0.92%0.86%1.13%0.78%0.64%0.42%

Financials

MLM vs. VMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Vulcan Materials Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B1.80B2.00B2.20B20222023202420252026
1.36B
1.76B
(MLM) Total Revenue
(VMC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MLM vs. VMC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Vulcan Materials Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
22.8%
24.1%
Portfolio components
MLM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 310.00M and revenue of 1.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.8%.

VMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vulcan Materials Company reported a gross profit of 422.70M and revenue of 1.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.1%.

MLM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 162.00M and revenue of 1.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

VMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vulcan Materials Company reported an operating income of 265.40M and revenue of 1.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.1%.

MLM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 79.00M and revenue of 1.36B, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.

VMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vulcan Materials Company reported a net income of 165.50M and revenue of 1.76B, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, MLM and VMC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MLM has higher volatility (10.08%) compared to VMC (9.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLM dropped -63.73% vs VMC's -76.02%.

VMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLM and VMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer