PortfoliosLab logo
MLM vs. CMT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MLM and CMT is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

MLM vs. CMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM) and Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

1,000.00%1,500.00%2,000.00%2,500.00%3,000.00%3,500.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
3,168.11%
1,130.23%
MLM
CMT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MLM:

-0.34

CMT:

-0.37

Sortino Ratio

MLM:

-0.33

CMT:

-0.28

Omega Ratio

MLM:

0.96

CMT:

0.97

Calmar Ratio

MLM:

-0.33

CMT:

-0.28

Martin Ratio

MLM:

-0.64

CMT:

-0.75

Ulcer Index

MLM:

13.69%

CMT:

20.59%

Daily Std Dev

MLM:

26.02%

CMT:

42.13%

Max Drawdown

MLM:

-63.73%

CMT:

-96.21%

Current Drawdown

MLM:

-13.42%

CMT:

-48.84%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MLM:

$31.69B

CMT:

$144.15M

EPS

MLM:

$17.45

CMT:

$1.51

PE Ratio

MLM:

29.96

CMT:

10.31

PEG Ratio

MLM:

3.58

CMT:

0.00

PS Ratio

MLM:

4.92

CMT:

0.48

PB Ratio

MLM:

3.56

CMT:

0.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

MLM:

$6.64B

CMT:

$224.23M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MLM:

$1.94B

CMT:

$39.96M

EBITDA (TTM)

MLM:

$1.99B

CMT:

$23.10M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLM achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly higher than CMT's -8.28% return. Over the past 10 years, MLM has outperformed CMT with an annualized return of 14.14%, while CMT has yielded a comparatively lower -4.02% annualized return.


MLM

YTD

3.75%

1M

13.66%

6M

-7.89%

1Y

-10.29%

5Y*

25.37%

10Y*

14.14%

CMT

YTD

-8.28%

1M

1.34%

6M

-1.24%

1Y

-21.44%

5Y*

41.42%

10Y*

-4.02%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MLM vs. CMT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MLM is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MLM is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MLM is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MLM is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MLM is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MLM is 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

CMT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMT is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMT is 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMT is 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMT is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMT is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMT is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MLM vs. CMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM) and Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MLM Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is comparable to the CMT Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLM and CMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.34
-0.37
MLM
CMT

Dividends

MLM vs. CMT - Dividend Comparison

MLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, while CMT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MLM
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
0.58%0.59%0.56%0.75%0.54%0.79%0.74%1.07%0.78%0.74%1.17%1.45%
CMT
Core Molding Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.41%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MLM vs. CMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLM drawdown since its inception was -63.73%, smaller than the maximum CMT drawdown of -96.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLM and CMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-13.42%
-48.84%
MLM
CMT

Volatility

MLM vs. CMT - Volatility Comparison

Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM) has a higher volatility of 10.10% compared to Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) at 9.57%. This indicates that MLM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
10.10%
9.57%
MLM
CMT

Financials

MLM vs. CMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Core Molding Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20212022202320242025
1.35B
62.50M
(MLM) Total Revenue
(CMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MLM vs. CMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Core Molding Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20212022202320242025
24.8%
15.8%
(MLM) Gross Margin
(CMT) Gross Margin
MLM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 335.00M and revenue of 1.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.8%.

CMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Core Molding Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 9.89M and revenue of 62.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.8%.

MLM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 194.00M and revenue of 1.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.

CMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Core Molding Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 870.00K and revenue of 62.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.4%.

MLM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 116.00M and revenue of 1.35B, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.

CMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Core Molding Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of -39.00K and revenue of 62.50M, resulting in a net margin of -0.1%.