MLM vs. CMT
MLM (Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.) and CMT (Core Molding Technologies, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — MLM in Building Materials, CMT in Specialty Chemicals. Over the past 10 years, MLM returned 13.33%/yr vs 5.78%/yr for CMT. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MLM vs. CMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLM achieves a -1.79% return, which is significantly lower than CMT's 16.41% return. Over the past 10 years, MLM has outperformed CMT with an annualized return of 13.33%, while CMT has yielded a comparatively lower 5.78% annualized return.
MLM
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 13.84%
- YTD
- -1.79%
- 6M
- -3.32%
- 1Y
- 13.92%
- 3Y*
- 11.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
CMT
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- 16.41%
- 6M
- 15.15%
- 1Y
- 41.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.59%
- 10Y*
- 5.78%
MLM vs. CMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLM Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. | -1.79% | 21.25% | 4.08% | 48.62% | -22.73% | 56.11% | 2.57% | 64.18% | -21.55% | 0.57% |
CMT Core Molding Technologies, Inc. | 16.41% | 21.22% | -10.74% | 42.65% | 52.64% | -39.56% | 333.23% | -54.29% | -67.03% | 27.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLM and CMT is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 1994 | 0.11 |
The correlation between MLM and CMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MLM:
$18.20
CMT:
$1.48
MLM:
33.50
CMT:
15.77
MLM:
1.50
CMT:
0.36
MLM:
5.62
CMT:
0.56
MLM:
$6.55B
CMT:
$270.93M
MLM:
$1.94B
CMT:
$44.31M
MLM:
$1.96B
CMT:
$18.05M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLM vs. CMT — Risk / Return Rank
MLM
CMT
MLM vs. CMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM) and Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MLM | CMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.20 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 2.12 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.43 | 4.00 | -2.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MLM vs. CMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLM drawdown since its inception was -63.73%, smaller than the maximum CMT drawdown of -96.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLM and CMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLM | CMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.73% | -96.21% | +32.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.69% | -19.89% | -4.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.78% | -55.95% | +29.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.75% | -55.95% | +23.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.34% | -95.45% | +47.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.64% | -21.28% | +7.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.66% | -53.30% | +31.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.75% | 10.51% | -0.76% |
Volatility
MLM vs. CMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM) is 10.08%, while Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) has a volatility of 10.83%. This indicates that MLM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLM | CMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.08% | 10.83% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.64% | 33.46% | -11.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.85% | 41.66% | -15.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.71% | 44.93% | -18.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.84% | 61.34% | -30.50% |
Dividends
MLM vs. CMT - Dividend Comparison
MLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, while CMT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMT Core Molding Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.41% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLM Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. | 0.54% | 0.52% | 0.59% | 0.56% | 0.75% | 0.54% | 0.79% | 0.74% | 1.07% | 0.78% | 0.74% | 1.17% |
Financials
MLM vs. CMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Core Molding Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MLM vs. CMT - Profitability Comparison
MLM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 310.00M and revenue of 1.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.8%.
CMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Core Molding Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 11.98M and revenue of 58.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.5%.
MLM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 162.00M and revenue of 1.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.
CMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Core Molding Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 764.00K and revenue of 58.58M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.
MLM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 79.00M and revenue of 1.36B, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.
CMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Core Molding Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 605.00K and revenue of 58.58M, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MLM and CMT have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMT has higher volatility (10.83%) compared to MLM (10.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLM dropped -63.73% vs CMT's -96.21%.
CMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLM and CMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer