MLM vs. AMR
MLM (Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.) and AMR (Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — MLM in Building Materials, AMR in Coking Coal. Over the past 5 years, MLM returned 12.44%/yr vs 51.08%/yr for AMR. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MLM vs. AMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLM achieves a -1.79% return, which is significantly higher than AMR's -12.40% return.
MLM
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 13.84%
- YTD
- -1.79%
- 6M
- -3.32%
- 1Y
- 13.92%
- 3Y*
- 11.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
AMR
- 1D
- -5.75%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- -12.40%
- 6M
- -14.62%
- 1Y
- 63.62%
- 3Y*
- 2.13%
- 5Y*
- 51.08%
- 10Y*
- —
MLM vs. AMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLM Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. | -1.79% | 21.25% | 4.08% | 48.62% | -22.73% | 56.11% | 2.57% | 64.18% | -21.55% | 4.16% |
AMR Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. | -12.40% | -0.12% | -40.95% | 133.87% | 150.06% | 436.94% | 25.64% | -86.23% | 10.71% | -4.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLM and AMR is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2017 | 0.22 |
The correlation between MLM and AMR shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MLM:
$36.84B
AMR:
$2.24B
MLM:
$18.20
AMR:
-$3.00
MLM:
5.62
AMR:
1.07
MLM:
3.26
AMR:
1.48
MLM:
$6.55B
AMR:
$2.12B
MLM:
$1.94B
AMR:
$31.72M
MLM:
$1.96B
AMR:
$128.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLM vs. AMR — Risk / Return Rank
MLM
AMR
MLM vs. AMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM) and Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MLM | AMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.20 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 1.83 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.43 | 3.95 | -2.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MLM vs. AMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLM drawdown since its inception was -63.73%, smaller than the maximum AMR drawdown of -97.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLM and AMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLM | AMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.73% | -97.35% | +33.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.69% | -34.85% | +10.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.78% | -77.51% | +50.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.75% | -77.51% | +44.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.64% | -60.41% | +46.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.66% | -40.40% | +18.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.75% | 16.17% | -6.42% |
Volatility
MLM vs. AMR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM) is 10.08%, while Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) has a volatility of 22.06%. This indicates that MLM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLM | AMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.08% | 22.06% | -11.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.64% | 39.81% | -18.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.85% | 61.77% | -35.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.71% | 59.65% | -32.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.84% | 73.66% | -42.82% |
Dividends
MLM vs. AMR - Dividend Comparison
MLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, while AMR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMR Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.57% | 4.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLM Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. | 0.54% | 0.52% | 0.59% | 0.56% | 0.75% | 0.54% | 0.79% | 0.74% | 1.07% | 0.78% | 0.74% | 1.17% |
Financials
MLM vs. AMR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MLM vs. AMR - Profitability Comparison
MLM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 310.00M and revenue of 1.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.8%.
AMR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 524.99M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MLM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 162.00M and revenue of 1.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.
AMR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.59M and revenue of 524.99M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.
MLM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 79.00M and revenue of 1.36B, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.
AMR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported a net income of -11.03M and revenue of 524.99M, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MLM and AMR have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMR has higher volatility (22.06%) compared to MLM (10.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLM dropped -63.73% vs AMR's -97.35%.
AMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLM and AMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer