PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MKL vs. CINF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


MKLCINF
YTD Return9.70%33.12%
1Y Return2.50%28.83%
3Y Return (Ann)8.27%7.77%
5Y Return (Ann)5.99%6.55%
10Y Return (Ann)9.32%14.19%
Sharpe Ratio0.151.52
Daily Std Dev23.09%20.56%
Max Drawdown-61.32%-59.69%
Current Drawdown-6.35%-1.72%

Fundamentals


MKLCINF
Market Cap$20.16B$21.22B
EPS$153.95$13.64
PE Ratio10.129.96
PEG Ratio4.35-158.72
Total Revenue (TTM)$16.19B$10.64B
Gross Profit (TTM)$16.63B$10.62B
EBITDA (TTM)-$61.03M$2.28B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between MKL and CINF is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

MKL vs. CINF - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MKL achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than CINF's 33.12% return. Over the past 10 years, MKL has underperformed CINF with an annualized return of 9.32%, while CINF has yielded a comparatively higher 14.19% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


5,000.00%10,000.00%15,000.00%20,000.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
18,474.90%
6,960.72%
MKL
CINF

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MKL vs. CINF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Markel Corporation (MKL) and Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MKL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MKL, currently valued at 0.15, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.15
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MKL, currently valued at 0.33, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.33
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MKL, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.05
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MKL, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.000.22
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MKL, currently valued at 0.55, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.000.55
CINF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CINF, currently valued at 1.52, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.52
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CINF, currently valued at 2.06, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.06
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CINF, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CINF, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.001.12
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CINF, currently valued at 6.28, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.006.28

MKL vs. CINF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MKL Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the CINF Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of MKL and CINF.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
0.15
1.52
MKL
CINF

Dividends

MKL vs. CINF - Dividend Comparison

MKL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MKL
Markel Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CINF
Cincinnati Financial Corporation
1.74%2.90%2.70%2.21%2.75%2.13%2.74%3.32%2.52%3.84%3.35%3.12%

Drawdowns

MKL vs. CINF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MKL drawdown since its inception was -61.32%, roughly equal to the maximum CINF drawdown of -59.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKL and CINF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-6.35%
-1.72%
MKL
CINF

Volatility

MKL vs. CINF - Volatility Comparison

Markel Corporation (MKL) and Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) have volatilities of 4.24% and 4.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
4.24%
4.20%
MKL
CINF

Financials

MKL vs. CINF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Markel Corporation and Cincinnati Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items