PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MKC vs. COST
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

MKC vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MKC vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MKC
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
-28.97%-8.33%13.97%-15.68%-12.65%2.67%14.70%23.65%39.01%11.34%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
15.72%-5.39%39.62%49.00%-19.05%51.82%32.67%45.70%10.60%22.37%

Fundamentals

EPS

MKC:

$6.10

COST:

$25.63

PE Ratio

MKC:

7.93

COST:

38.88

PEG Ratio

MKC:

5.77

COST:

3.04

PS Ratio

MKC:

1.83

COST:

1.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

MKC:

$7.11B

COST:

$286.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MKC:

$2.70B

COST:

$19.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

MKC:

$1.22B

COST:

$12.73B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MKC achieves a -28.97% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 15.72% return. Over the past 10 years, MKC has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 1.53%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 22.28% annualized return.


MKC

1D
-4.08%
1M
-30.79%
YTD
-28.97%
6M
-27.60%
1Y
-39.64%
3Y*
-14.58%
5Y*
-9.68%
10Y*
1.53%

COST

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.62%
YTD
15.72%
6M
8.94%
1Y
4.99%
3Y*
27.83%
5Y*
24.29%
10Y*
22.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MKC vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MKC
MKC Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MKC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MKC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
MKC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
MKC Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MKC Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MKC vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MKCCOSTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.41

0.25

-1.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-2.09

0.50

-2.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

1.06

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

0.31

-1.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-2.40

0.61

-3.02

MKC vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MKC Sharpe Ratio is -1.41, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MKC and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MKCCOSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.41

0.25

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.41

1.08

-1.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

1.02

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.59

-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between MKC and COST is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MKC vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

MKC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than COST's 0.52% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MKC
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
3.78%2.69%2.24%2.32%1.81%1.44%1.68%1.37%1.53%1.89%1.89%1.91%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.52%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%

Drawdowns

MKC vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MKC drawdown since its inception was -49.54%, smaller than the maximum COST drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKC and COST.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MKCCOSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.54%

-53.39%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.93%

-19.35%

-19.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.54%

-31.40%

-18.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.54%

-31.40%

-18.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.54%

-6.95%

-42.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.82%

-13.40%

+2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.53%

9.67%

+6.86%

Volatility

MKC vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) has a higher volatility of 10.84% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 4.38%. This indicates that MKC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MKCCOSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.84%

4.38%

+6.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.28%

13.33%

+8.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.18%

20.08%

+8.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.89%

22.51%

+1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.99%

21.90%

+2.09%

Financials

MKC vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between McCormick & Company, Incorporated and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
1.87B
69.60B
(MKC) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MKC vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between McCormick & Company, Incorporated and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
37.8%
-12.6%
Portfolio components
MKC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 708.90M and revenue of 1.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.8%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -8.80B and revenue of 69.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -12.6%.

MKC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported an operating income of 227.50M and revenue of 1.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.61B and revenue of 69.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.

MKC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 1.87B, resulting in a net margin of 54.2%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.04B and revenue of 69.60B, resulting in a net margin of 2.9%.