MJ vs. ICLN
Compare and contrast key facts about ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN).
MJ and ICLN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MJ is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Alternative Harvest Index. It was launched on Dec 2, 2015. ICLN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008. Both MJ and ICLN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MJ or ICLN.
Correlation
The correlation between MJ and ICLN is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
MJ vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MJ:
-0.29
ICLN:
-0.99
MJ:
-0.05
ICLN:
-1.33
MJ:
0.99
ICLN:
0.85
MJ:
-0.18
ICLN:
-0.33
MJ:
-0.68
ICLN:
-1.77
MJ:
25.20%
ICLN:
13.15%
MJ:
58.26%
ICLN:
23.53%
MJ:
-93.14%
ICLN:
-87.15%
MJ:
-93.11%
ICLN:
-68.99%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MJ having a -24.46% return and ICLN slightly higher at -24.28%.
MJ
-24.46%
-10.71%
-33.58%
-21.24%
-30.19%
N/A
ICLN
-24.28%
-3.36%
-16.63%
-23.39%
0.90%
3.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MJ vs. ICLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
MJ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ICLN's 0.46% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MJ vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MJ vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison
MJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.20%, more than ICLN's 1.81% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MJ ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF | 15.20% | 3.59% | 4.13% | 1.93% | 4.60% | 5.26% | 2.23% | 2.64% | 16.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.81% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.34% | 1.36% | 2.77% | 2.49% | 3.88% | 2.36% | 2.83% | 2.11% |
Drawdowns
MJ vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MJ drawdown since its inception was -93.14%, which is greater than ICLN's maximum drawdown of -87.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MJ and ICLN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MJ vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison
ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) has a higher volatility of 9.03% compared to iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) at 5.80%. This indicates that MJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.