PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIOIX vs. GFFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIOIX vs. GFFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Opportunity Portfolio (MIOIX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2 (GFFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIOIX achieves a 4.85% return, which is significantly higher than GFFFX's 4.51% return. Over the past 10 years, MIOIX has underperformed GFFFX with an annualized return of 9.47%, while GFFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.27% annualized return.


MIOIX

1D
4.10%
1M
-0.74%
6M
4.91%
YTD
4.85%
1Y
8.38%
3Y*
11.03%
5Y*
-1.96%
10Y*
9.47%
ALL TIME*
9.55%

GFFFX

1D
1.91%
1M
-3.24%
6M
3.86%
YTD
4.51%
1Y
13.10%
3Y*
19.90%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
15.27%
ALL TIME*
14.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MIOIX vs. GFFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIOIX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Opportunity Portfolio
4.85%12.64%19.32%21.11%-43.76%-5.25%55.49%35.20%-12.03%53.41%
GFFFX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2
4.51%19.96%28.28%37.51%-30.61%19.55%38.16%28.43%-2.96%26.38%

Correlation

The correlation between MIOIX and GFFFX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2010

0.79

The correlation between MIOIX and GFFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIOIX vs. GFFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MIOIX
MIOIX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MIOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
MIOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

GFFFX
GFFFX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GFFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
GFFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MIOIX vs. GFFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Opportunity Portfolio (MIOIX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2 (GFFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MIOIXGFFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.13

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

0.82

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.90

2.96

-2.06

MIOIX vs. GFFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIOIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the GFFFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIOIX and GFFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MIOIX vs. GFFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIOIX drawdown since its inception was -60.88%, which is greater than GFFFX's maximum drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIOIX and GFFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIOIXGFFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.88%

-36.26%

-24.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.50%

-13.74%

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.50%

-21.55%

+3.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.75%

-36.26%

-20.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.88%

-36.26%

-24.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.99%

-5.45%

-17.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.87%

-5.55%

-10.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.01%

3.78%

+2.23%

Volatility

MIOIX vs. GFFFX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Opportunity Portfolio (MIOIX) has a higher volatility of 8.19% compared to American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2 (GFFFX) at 4.82%. This indicates that MIOIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIOIXGFFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.19%

4.82%

+3.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.80%

13.65%

+7.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.28%

16.91%

+6.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.65%

20.53%

+5.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.37%

19.76%

+2.61%

MIOIX vs. GFFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIOIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GFFFX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIOIX vs. GFFFX - Dividend Comparison

MIOIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GFFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.48%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFFFX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2
10.48%10.95%9.23%7.64%4.32%8.42%4.51%7.38%12.29%7.27%6.87%9.13%
MIOIX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Opportunity Portfolio
0.00%0.00%0.16%0.00%9.25%2.13%0.24%0.00%0.24%1.63%0.02%3.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIOIX and GFFFX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MIOIX has higher volatility (8.19%) compared to GFFFX (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIOIX dropped -60.88% vs GFFFX's -36.26%.

GFFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIOIX and GFFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer