PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MINT vs. WPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MINT and WPC is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

MINT vs. WPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund (MINT) and W. P. Carey Inc. (WPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.66%
-6.83%
MINT
WPC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MINT:

13.40

WPC:

-0.69

Sortino Ratio

MINT:

31.42

WPC:

-0.85

Omega Ratio

MINT:

9.26

WPC:

0.90

Calmar Ratio

MINT:

44.88

WPC:

-0.45

Martin Ratio

MINT:

491.00

WPC:

-1.15

Ulcer Index

MINT:

0.01%

WPC:

12.41%

Daily Std Dev

MINT:

0.43%

WPC:

20.72%

Max Drawdown

MINT:

-4.62%

WPC:

-52.45%

Current Drawdown

MINT:

0.00%

WPC:

-27.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINT achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly higher than WPC's -0.39% return. Over the past 10 years, MINT has underperformed WPC with an annualized return of 2.22%, while WPC has yielded a comparatively higher 3.42% annualized return.


MINT

YTD

0.16%

1M

0.36%

6M

2.66%

1Y

5.79%

5Y*

2.51%

10Y*

2.22%

WPC

YTD

-0.39%

1M

-2.75%

6M

-6.83%

1Y

-13.86%

5Y*

-2.15%

10Y*

3.42%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MINT vs. WPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MINT is 100100
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MINT is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MINT is 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MINT is 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MINT is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MINT is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

WPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WPC is 1616
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WPC is 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WPC is 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WPC is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WPC is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WPC is 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MINT vs. WPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund (MINT) and W. P. Carey Inc. (WPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MINT, currently valued at 13.40, compared to the broader market0.002.004.0013.40-0.69
The chart of Sortino ratio for MINT, currently valued at 31.42, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0031.42-0.85
The chart of Omega ratio for MINT, currently valued at 9.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.009.260.90
The chart of Calmar ratio for MINT, currently valued at 44.88, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0044.88-0.45
The chart of Martin ratio for MINT, currently valued at 491.00, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00491.00-1.15
MINT
WPC

The current MINT Sharpe Ratio is 13.40, which is higher than the WPC Sharpe Ratio of -0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINT and WPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.005.0010.0015.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
13.40
-0.69
MINT
WPC

Dividends

MINT vs. WPC - Dividend Comparison

MINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, less than WPC's 6.43% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund
5.21%5.22%4.91%1.90%0.44%1.15%2.65%2.32%1.61%1.35%0.88%0.80%
WPC
W. P. Carey Inc.
6.43%6.41%6.17%5.43%5.13%5.91%5.17%6.26%5.82%6.65%6.49%5.26%

Drawdowns

MINT vs. WPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINT drawdown since its inception was -4.62%, smaller than the maximum WPC drawdown of -52.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINT and WPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember20250
-27.69%
MINT
WPC

Volatility

MINT vs. WPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund (MINT) is 0.09%, while W. P. Carey Inc. (WPC) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that MINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.09%
6.03%
MINT
WPC
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab