MINT vs. AMND

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) and AMND (ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050) are both exchange-traded funds - MINT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO, while AMND is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend Index. MINT is actively managed, while AMND is passively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MINT charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AMND.

Performance

MINT vs. AMND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 (AMND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MINT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.81%
• 6M: 2.20%
• 1Y: 4.67%
• 3Y*: 5.41%
• 5Y*: 3.47%
• 10Y*: 2.70%

AMND

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MINT vs. AMND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	1.81%	4.74%	5.94%	6.26%	-1.01%	-0.03%	0.66%
AMND ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050	0.00%	0.00%	40.42%	13.60%	21.27%	34.91%	10.45%

Correlation

The correlation between MINT and AMND is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2020	0.04

Return for Risk

MINT vs. AMND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINT

MINT Risk / Return Rank: 100
MINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Omega Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINT vs. AMND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 (AMND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MINT	AMND	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	17.09	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	65.54	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	20.53	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	94.30	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	939.26	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MINT	AMND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	5.99	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	2.87	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.47	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MINT	AMND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.05%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.16%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-2.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-4.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.17%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MINT	AMND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.09%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.20%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.58%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.95%	—	—

MINT vs. AMND - Expense Ratio Comparison

MINT has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than AMND's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MINT vs. AMND - Dividend Comparison

MINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, while AMND has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMND ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050	0.00%	0.00%	5.14%	6.56%	6.37%	7.10%	2.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	4.28%	4.63%	5.22%	4.91%	1.90%	0.44%	1.15%	2.65%	2.32%	1.61%	1.35%	0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MINT and AMND in my portfolio?

MINT and AMND have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MINT or AMND?

On fees, MINT is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MINT or AMND?

MINT is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AMND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MINT or AMND?

MINT has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 0.00% for AMND.

What is the main difference between MINT and AMND?

MINT is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while AMND is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for MINT and 0.75% for AMND.