PortfoliosLab logo
MIGI vs. BITF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MIGI and BITF is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

MIGI vs. BITF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mawson Infrastructure Group, Inc. (MIGI) and Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MIGI:

-0.30

BITF:

-0.63

Sortino Ratio

MIGI:

0.71

BITF:

-0.60

Omega Ratio

MIGI:

1.09

BITF:

0.94

Calmar Ratio

MIGI:

-0.56

BITF:

-0.58

Martin Ratio

MIGI:

-1.10

BITF:

-1.16

Ulcer Index

MIGI:

50.94%

BITF:

46.45%

Daily Std Dev

MIGI:

179.27%

BITF:

90.90%

Max Drawdown

MIGI:

-99.90%

BITF:

-95.72%

Current Drawdown

MIGI:

-99.84%

BITF:

-89.45%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MIGI:

$12.37M

BITF:

$594.91M

EPS

MIGI:

-$1.51

BITF:

-$0.17

PS Ratio

MIGI:

0.23

BITF:

2.84

PB Ratio

MIGI:

5.27

BITF:

0.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

MIGI:

$54.31M

BITF:

$198.73M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MIGI:

$19.22M

BITF:

-$20.29M

EBITDA (TTM)

MIGI:

-$10.95M

BITF:

$46.39M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIGI achieves a -29.49% return, which is significantly higher than BITF's -37.18% return.


MIGI

YTD

-29.49%

1M

-15.45%

6M

-71.77%

1Y

-53.02%

3Y*

-64.13%

5Y*

-41.83%

10Y*

N/A

BITF

YTD

-37.18%

1M

-6.17%

6M

-56.47%

1Y

-57.06%

3Y*

-20.17%

5Y*

22.09%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Mawson Infrastructure Group, Inc.

Bitfarms Ltd.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MIGI vs. BITF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIGI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MIGI is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MIGI is 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MIGI is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MIGI is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MIGI is 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MIGI is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

BITF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BITF is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BITF is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BITF is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BITF is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BITF is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BITF is 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MIGI vs. BITF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mawson Infrastructure Group, Inc. (MIGI) and Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MIGI Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is higher than the BITF Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIGI and BITF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

MIGI vs. BITF - Dividend Comparison

Neither MIGI nor BITF has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MIGI vs. BITF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIGI drawdown since its inception was -99.90%, roughly equal to the maximum BITF drawdown of -95.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIGI and BITF.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

MIGI vs. BITF - Volatility Comparison

Mawson Infrastructure Group, Inc. (MIGI) has a higher volatility of 28.39% compared to Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF) at 18.90%. This indicates that MIGI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

MIGI vs. BITF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mawson Infrastructure Group, Inc. and Bitfarms Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-20.00M0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M20212022202320242025
13.81M
56.16M
(MIGI) Total Revenue
(BITF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MIGI vs. BITF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mawson Infrastructure Group, Inc. and Bitfarms Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
42.9%
2.5%
(MIGI) Gross Margin
(BITF) Gross Margin
MIGI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Mawson Infrastructure Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.92M and revenue of 13.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.9%.

BITF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bitfarms Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.39M and revenue of 56.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 2.5%.

MIGI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Mawson Infrastructure Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 576.68K and revenue of 13.81M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

BITF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bitfarms Ltd. reported an operating income of -16.39M and revenue of 56.16M, resulting in an operating margin of -29.2%.

MIGI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Mawson Infrastructure Group, Inc. reported a net income of -310.86K and revenue of 13.81M, resulting in a net margin of -2.3%.

BITF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bitfarms Ltd. reported a net income of 15.17M and revenue of 56.16M, resulting in a net margin of 27.0%.