MIGI vs. BITF

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Mawson Infrastructure Group, Inc. (MIGI) and Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF).

Performance

MIGI vs. BITF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mawson Infrastructure Group, Inc. (MIGI) and Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MIGI vs. BITF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MIGI Mawson Infrastructure Group, Inc.	-54.16%	-74.72%	-73.97%	131.88%	-96.53%	215.71%	16.67%	-78.82%	-78.70%
BITF Bitfarms Ltd.	-15.74%	57.72%	-48.80%	561.36%	-91.29%	165.79%	397.66%	-27.96%	-64.19%

Fundamentals

EPS MIGI : -$11.43 BITF : -$0.51
PS Ratio MIGI : 0.04 BITF : 4.79
Total Revenue (TTM) MIGI : $51.59M BITF : $229.28M
Gross Profit (TTM) MIGI : $21.73M BITF : -$18.90M
EBITDA (TTM) MIGI : -$2.15M BITF : -$149.60M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIGI achieves a -54.16% return, which is significantly lower than BITF's -15.74% return.

MIGI

• 1D: -1.03%
• 1M: -34.80%
• YTD: -54.16%
• 6M: -81.50%
• 1Y: -79.68%
• 3Y*: -68.54%
• 5Y*: -72.64%
• 10Y*: —

BITF

• 1D: 1.54%
• 1M: -7.91%
• YTD: -15.74%
• 6M: -29.29%
• 1Y: 144.99%
• 3Y*: 26.85%
• 5Y*: -16.81%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MIGI vs. BITF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIGI

MIGI Risk / Return Rank: 17
MIGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
MIGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
MIGI Omega Ratio Rank: 23
MIGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
MIGI Martin Ratio Rank: 13

BITF

BITF Risk / Return Rank: 78
BITF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
BITF Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
BITF Omega Ratio Rank: 78
BITF Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
BITF Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIGI vs. BITF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mawson Infrastructure Group, Inc. (MIGI) and Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MIGI	BITF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.49	1.36	-1.84
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.29	2.35	-2.64
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.27	-0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.85	2.05	-2.91
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.36	3.73	-5.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MIGI vs. BITF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIGI Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the BITF Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIGI and BITF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MIGI	BITF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.49	1.36	-1.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.48	-0.16	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.34	0.00	-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between MIGI and BITF is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MIGI vs. BITF - Dividend Comparison

Neither MIGI nor BITF has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MIGI vs. BITF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIGI drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, roughly equal to the maximum BITF drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIGI and BITF.

Drawdown Indicators

	MIGI	BITF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.97%	-100.00%	+0.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-94.35%	-73.65%	-20.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.90%	-95.72%	-4.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.97%	-77.68%	-22.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.32%	-67.90%	-20.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	59.17%	40.54%	+18.63%

Volatility

MIGI vs. BITF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mawson Infrastructure Group, Inc. (MIGI) is 21.14%, while Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF) has a volatility of 24.76%. This indicates that MIGI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MIGI	BITF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.14%	24.76%	-3.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	138.83%	79.34%	+59.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	164.48%	107.51%	+56.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	150.90%	106.11%	+44.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	185.45%	747,878.46%	-747,693.01%

Financials