MIGFX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
MIGFX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Jan 1, 1935. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
MIGFX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MIGFX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIGFX MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund | -9.36% | 9.97% | 27.25% | 24.13% | -19.20% | 26.06% | 22.55% | 39.89% | 0.81% | 28.68% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -9.73% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MIGFX having a -9.36% return and SCHG slightly lower at -9.73%. Over the past 10 years, MIGFX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 13.69%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.95% annualized return.
MIGFX
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -5.97%
- YTD
- -9.36%
- 6M
- -8.66%
- 1Y
- 4.69%
- 3Y*
- 13.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.85%
- 10Y*
- 13.69%
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- -9.73%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MIGFX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIGFX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MIGFX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
MIGFX
SCHG
MIGFX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIGFX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.28 | 0.76 | -0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.54 | 1.24 | -0.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.17 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | 1.09 | -0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.43 | 3.71 | -2.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIGFX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 | 0.76 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.57 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.79 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.79 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between MIGFX and SCHG is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MIGFX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
MIGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.57%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIGFX MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund | 12.57% | 11.39% | 17.15% | 4.11% | 4.49% | 10.47% | 7.43% | 7.39% | 10.76% | 6.87% | 5.12% | 6.51% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
MIGFX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIGFX drawdown since its inception was -61.83%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIGFX and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIGFX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.83% | -34.59% | -27.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.77% | -16.41% | +2.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.67% | -34.59% | +7.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.42% | -34.59% | +2.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.24% | -12.51% | +1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.00% | -5.22% | -13.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.83% | 4.84% | -1.01% |
Volatility
MIGFX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX) is 5.49%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 6.77%. This indicates that MIGFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MIGFX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 6.77% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.81% | 12.54% | -2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.85% | 22.45% | -4.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 22.31% | -4.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 21.51% | -3.33% |