PortfoliosLab logo
MID vs. RFG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MID and RFG is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

MID vs. RFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

MID:

13.57%

RFG:

11.43%

Max Drawdown

MID:

-0.90%

RFG:

-0.46%

Current Drawdown

MID:

-0.05%

RFG:

-0.41%

Returns By Period


MID

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

RFG

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MID vs. RFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MID has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than RFG's 0.35% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MID vs. RFG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MID
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MID is 3434
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MID is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MID is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MID is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MID is 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MID is 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

RFG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RFG is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RFG is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RFG is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RFG is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RFG is 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RFG is 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MID vs. RFG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

MID vs. RFG - Dividend Comparison

MID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than RFG's 0.32% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MID
American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF
0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RFG
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF
0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MID vs. RFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MID drawdown since its inception was -0.90%, which is greater than RFG's maximum drawdown of -0.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MID and RFG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MID vs. RFG - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...