MIAQX vs. HFQAX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MIAQX (American Funds Multi-Sector Income Fund) and HFQAX (Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund) are both mutual funds - MIAQX is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by American Funds, while HFQAX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Janus Henderson. Over the past 5 years, MIAQX returned 2.34%/yr vs 10.12%/yr for HFQAX. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MIAQX charges 0.78%/yr vs 1.24%/yr for HFQAX.

Performance

MIAQX vs. HFQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Multi-Sector Income Fund (MIAQX) and Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIAQX achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly lower than HFQAX's 11.69% return.

MIAQX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 1.44%
• 6M: 1.84%
• 1Y: 7.44%
• 3Y*: 7.37%
• 5Y*: 2.34%
• 10Y*: —

HFQAX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 1.77%
• YTD: 11.69%
• 6M: 14.77%
• 1Y: 25.59%
• 3Y*: 17.99%
• 5Y*: 10.12%
• 10Y*: 8.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIAQX vs. HFQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
MIAQX American Funds Multi-Sector Income Fund	1.44%	7.81%	6.08%	9.47%	-13.04%	2.10%	8.29%	3.20%
HFQAX Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund	11.69%	29.61%	6.86%	10.17%	-6.59%	12.45%	1.66%	10.31%

Correlation

The correlation between MIAQX and HFQAX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019	0.37

Return for Risk

MIAQX vs. HFQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIAQX

MIAQX Risk / Return Rank: 55
MIAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
MIAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
MIAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
MIAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
MIAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

HFQAX

HFQAX Risk / Return Rank: 56
HFQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
HFQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
HFQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
HFQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
HFQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIAQX vs. HFQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Multi-Sector Income Fund (MIAQX) and Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MIAQX	HFQAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	2.37	-0.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	3.20	+0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.44	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	2.67	+0.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.63	9.61	+3.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MIAQX vs. HFQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIAQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the HFQAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIAQX and HFQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MIAQX	HFQAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.99	2.37	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.78	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.32	+0.29

Drawdowns

MIAQX vs. HFQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIAQX drawdown since its inception was -18.01%, smaller than the maximum HFQAX drawdown of -52.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIAQX and HFQAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MIAQX	HFQAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.01%	-52.77%	+34.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.84%	-9.99%	+7.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.60%	-12.20%	+7.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.01%	-21.83%	+3.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-2.02%	+1.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.01%	-10.87%	+6.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.62%	2.78%	-2.16%

Volatility

MIAQX vs. HFQAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Multi-Sector Income Fund (MIAQX) is 1.39%, while Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that MIAQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MIAQX	HFQAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.39%	4.54%	-3.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.90%	9.37%	-6.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.65%	11.34%	-7.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.78%	13.04%	-8.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.37%	14.75%	-9.38%

MIAQX vs. HFQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIAQX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than HFQAX's 1.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

MIAQX vs. HFQAX - Dividend Comparison

MIAQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, which matches HFQAX's 5.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HFQAX Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund	5.97%	6.59%	7.96%	7.89%	8.02%	6.92%	7.25%	6.80%	7.66%	6.03%	6.77%	6.60%
MIAQX American Funds Multi-Sector Income Fund	6.02%	5.98%	5.57%	4.83%	3.39%	3.77%	3.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MIAQX and HFQAX in my portfolio?

MIAQX and HFQAX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MIAQX or HFQAX?

HFQAX has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to MIAQX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIAQX dropped -18.01% vs HFQAX's -52.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HFQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.