MGV vs. WHR

In the year-to-date period, MGV achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly higher than WHR's -28.88% return. Over the past 10 years, MGV has outperformed WHR with an annualized return of 10.09%, while WHR has yielded a comparatively lower -4.85% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Whirlpool Corporation (WHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MGV Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is higher than the WHR Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGV and WHR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than WHR's 8.75% yield.

The maximum MGV drawdown since its inception was -56.31%, smaller than the maximum WHR drawdown of -82.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGV and WHR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) is 5.19%, while Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) has a volatility of 9.12%. This indicates that MGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.