MGRVX vs. GLDM

In the year-to-date period, MGRVX achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 23.24% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

MGRVX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.18% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International Growth Fund Class R4 (MGRVX) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MGRVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGRVX and GLDM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

MGRVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum MGRVX drawdown since its inception was -35.29%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGRVX and GLDM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for MFS International Growth Fund Class R4 (MGRVX) is 3.46%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 8.82%. This indicates that MGRVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.